Hi All,
Can you please let me know if the below explanation is correct?
Which of the following most weakens the argument?
A. The university is awaiting patents on several inventions that are going to be lapped up by the industry no sooner than the government issues the certificates. - Irrelevant cause it the pending patent approvals has nothing to do with the difficulty in meeting the expenses and finding ways to increase the revenue.
B. The university holds vast tracts of land outside the city where leasing arable lands out to big farming companies earns good money. - Irrelevant as it provides solution on how to increase the revenue
C. Each building on campus is named after one or more distinguished alumnus of the university.
correct answer- as it implies that most of the buildings are named after alumnus who donated?
D. The alumni donate a handsome amount every year. - strengthens as every year the buildings are named after donor who has donated the maximum amount
E. The university is eligible for grants from the federal governments.- though the govt funds the university - here it could only fund for the educational services so irrelevant.