GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Oct 2018, 09:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Please grade my AWA

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Posts: 3
Please grade my AWA  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2018, 12:09
The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company:

“When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today.
Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location.
Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees.”

Discuss how well reasoned … etc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The argument is about a company (the Apogee Company) that was more profitable when all its operations were in one location than today.
The author suggests that to improve profitability, Apogee Company should close its field offices and conduct all its operations from
a single location, cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees. The argument is superficial and
presents flaws in different points; it doesn't analyze the reason why the profitability of the company is declined with a less centralized structure,
and moreover presents the centralization as the solution for all the company's problems.

First, from the first line of the argument is possible to notice how the author attribute the decline in profitability to the decentralization
of the company without providing further information; in fact, a decline in profitability could depends on a decrease in revenues or on an increase
in costs, in either cases not necessary related to the decentralization of the company. Could be possible that the economy today is down due to a recession,
or that a new competitor entered the market steeling clients from the company. Different could be the reasons why the company lost profits,
and so to improve the reasoning more information is required.

Second, the argument describes the centralization as the solution to all the problems,
but instead could be possible that a distributed structure of the operations can help to improve the name of the company locally, attracting more
clients and in long term gaining more profits. Another reason on the fact that the centralization is wrongly considered the solution to the lost profits,
could be the fact that to re-centralize the operations the company must spend a lot in relocate people, lowering even more the profits.

As mentioned the argument is superficial, and a better analysis of the market today and before the decentralization is needed to better understand the causes
of the lost in profits, which could be caused by the decentralization, as the argument said, or there could be other factors that changed the profitability of the company.

In conclusion the argument is limited and presents different flaws that can be solved with a deep analysis of the context in which the company is and was.
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3304
Re: Please grade my AWA  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2018, 12:50
Top Contributor
Retired Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 28 May 2014
Posts: 528
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Please grade my AWA  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2018, 13:36
sharp1989 wrote:
The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company:

“When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today.
Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location.
Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees.”

Discuss how well reasoned … etc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The argument is about a company (the Apogee Company) that was more profitable when all its operations were in one location than today.
The author suggests that to improve profitability, Apogee Company should close its field offices and conduct all its operations from
a single location, cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees. The argument is superficial and
presents flaws in different points; it doesn't analyze the reason why the profitability of the company is declined with a less centralized structure,
and moreover presents the centralization as the solution for all the company's problems.

First, from the first line of the argument is possible to notice how the author attribute the decline in profitability to the decentralization
of the company without providing further information; in fact, a decline in profitability could depends on a decrease in revenues or on an increase
in costs, in either cases not necessary related to the decentralization of the company. Could be possible that the economy today is down due to a recession,
or that a new competitor entered the market steeling clients from the company. Different could be the reasons why the company lost profits,
and so to improve the reasoning more information is required.

Second, the argument describes the centralization as the solution to all the problems,
but instead could be possible that a distributed structure of the operations can help to improve the name of the company locally, attracting more
clients and in long term gaining more profits. Another reason on the fact that the centralization is wrongly considered the solution to the lost profits,
could be the fact that to re-centralize the operations the company must spend a lot in relocate people, lowering even more the profits.

As mentioned the argument is superficial, and a better analysis of the market today and before the decentralization is needed to better understand the causes
of the lost in profits, which could be caused by the decentralization, as the argument said, or there could be other factors that changed the profitability of the company.

In conclusion the argument is limited and presents different flaws that can be solved with a deep analysis of the context in which the company is and was.


Use this link:
http://www.gmatawa.com/
_________________

440 to 730: If I Can, You Can Too

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Please grade my AWA &nbs [#permalink] 10 Jan 2018, 13:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Please grade my AWA

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.