GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 10 Dec 2018, 20:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free lesson on number properties

December 10, 2018

December 10, 2018

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Practice the one most important Quant section - Integer properties, and rapidly improve your skills.
• ### Free GMAT Prep Hour

December 11, 2018

December 11, 2018

09:00 PM EST

10:00 PM EST

Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. December 11 at 9 PM EST.

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 17 May 2018
Posts: 4
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 670 Q45 V37
GPA: 3.91

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2018, 17:14
The following appeared in a memorandum from the director of research and development at Ready-to-Ware, a software engineering firm:
“The package of benefits and incentives that Ready-to-Ware offers to professional staff is too costly. Our quarterly profits have declined since the package was introduced two years ago, at the time of our incorporation. Moreover, the package had little positive effect, as we have had only marginal success in recruiting and training high-quality professional staff. To become more profitable again, Ready-to-Ware should, therefore, offer the reduced benefits package that was in place two years ago and use the savings to fund our current research and development initiatives.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The argument claims that the current package of benefits and incentives offered to Ready-to-Ware employees is too expensive therefore, it is causing a decline in the company’s quarterly profits. The author of the memorandum, Ready-to-Ware’s director of research and development, suggests that the company revert back to the reduced benefits package that was in place two years earlier. In this way, the company will return to its former profitability. Stated in this way, the argument provides poor reasoning, conveys a distorted view of the situation, and fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated.

First, the argument readily assumes that the company’s quarterly profits have declined due to the introduction of the package of benefits and incentives. The author fails to mention any other business factors. How many products is Ready-to-Ware selling? Which of those products are the most or least profitable? Also, the author conveniently fails to provide information on how much money the R&D department spends per year and how much of a profit it generates. The argument would have been much clearer if the answers to these questions were provided.

Second, the argument claims that the current benefits package has had little positive effect because the company has only seen marginal success in recruiting and training high-quality professional staff. The author is assuming that a great benefits and incentives package will only motivate new employees who are recruited and trained as part of the professional staff. He implies that the package had minimal effect on enticing new employees. Yet, the director fails to mention whether the package has had a positive or negative effect on the company’s current employees. Not enough evidence is provided for the argument to be convincing.

Finally, the author of the memorandum, Ready-to-Ware’s director of research and development, seems to have an ulterior motive. In order to become more profitable, the director suggests that the company offer a reduced benefits package and use the savings to fund its current research and development initiatives. The director is using this memo as a ploy to gain more funds for the R&D department. Is the research and development department low on funds, possibly due to many failed design initiatives? Information on the revenue of the R&D department should also be provided to make the argument more convincing.

In conclusion, the argument is flawed for several reasons. The author consistently provides insufficient information. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned how the benefits package affected all employees, not just new recruits. Also, in order to assess the argument properly, statistics on the company’s financials should be present. What are they selling? Which departments are the most profitable? Which departments spend the most money and see the least amount of return? Without convincing answers to these questions, one is left with the impression that the claim is a ploy for more funding and not an employee’s concern over the well-being of the company.
CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 418
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2018, 04:26
Bumping for discussion. Does anyone want to lend Alexa a helping hand before I do?
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Need a laugh and a break? Go here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mental-break-funny-videos-270269.html

CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 418
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2018, 07:24
helloalexasays,

Welcome to the GMAT Club! While no on responded to your post, I can assure you that the community is helpful. Below you will find a link to a high quality AWA. If you follow this method, you will get a good score. Link: https://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6 ... 64327.html

The good news about AWA is that schools do not care that much about it. As long as you get above a 4, schools will not penalize you (who ever heard of a 770 getting turned down from HBS because of their AWA?).

If you want, I can critique the whole passage, but given the fact that I believe you are a native speaker, or have a strong command of the language, you probably do not need that much help. From a cursory overview, you looked like you were in good shape for this passage.

Let me know and welcome to the Club!
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Need a laugh and a break? Go here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mental-break-funny-videos-270269.html

Intern
Joined: 17 May 2018
Posts: 4
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 670 Q45 V37
GPA: 3.91

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2018, 14:23

Welcome to the GMAT Club! While no on responded to your post, I can assure you that the community is helpful. Below you will find a link to a high quality AWA. If you follow this method, you will get a good score. Link:

The good news about AWA is that schools do not care that much about it. As long as you get above a 4, schools will not penalize you (who ever heard of a 770 getting turned down from HBS because of their AWA?).

If you want, I can critique the whole passage, but given the fact that I believe you are a native speaker, or have a strong command of the language, you probably do not need that much help. From a cursory overview, you looked like you were in good shape for this passage.

Let me know and welcome to the Club!

Thanks nightblade354! I was just wondering if my essay was a 4.5 or higher but you said I'm in good shape so no need to critique it.
CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 418
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2018, 17:24
helloalexasays,

Always glad to help! If you need further help, do not hesitate to shoot me a PM. Also, please do not hesitate to post on the forum or in the general chat. The people here are always glad to help.

FYI, use the @ symbol before a name to tag someone!

_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Need a laugh and a break? Go here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mental-break-funny-videos-270269.html

Display posts from previous: Sort by