Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
26 Mar 2021, 02:07
Kudos
Bookmarks
EducationAisle please could you help me with the following
Possible long-term consequences of the “greenhouse effect,” the gradual warming of the Earth’s climate, may include melting the polar ice caps and a rising sea level.
(A) may include melting the polar ice caps and a rising sea level
(1) melting the polar ice caps - this sees as if someone is going to melt the ice caps
(2) a rising sea level - "a rising" is an adjective while "sea level" is a noun
Q: Could you comment on the parallelism
(B) may include the melting of polar ice caps and the rising sea level
(1) the melting of polar ice caps - A noun phrase
(2) the rising sea level - "the rising" is an adjective while "sea level" is a simple noun
Q: is the parallelism correct? We can have a noun phrase parallel to a simple noun right?
(E) include melting of the polar ice caps and a rise in sea level
(1) melting of the polar ice caps - Noun phrase
(2) a rise in sea level - Noun phrase
Hence correct parallelism in (E)
Possible long-term consequences of the “greenhouse effect,” the gradual warming of the Earth’s climate, may include melting the polar ice caps and a rising sea level.
(A) may include melting the polar ice caps and a rising sea level
(1) melting the polar ice caps - this sees as if someone is going to melt the ice caps
(2) a rising sea level - "a rising" is an adjective while "sea level" is a noun
Q: Could you comment on the parallelism
(B) may include the melting of polar ice caps and the rising sea level
(1) the melting of polar ice caps - A noun phrase
(2) the rising sea level - "the rising" is an adjective while "sea level" is a simple noun
Q: is the parallelism correct? We can have a noun phrase parallel to a simple noun right?
(E) include melting of the polar ice caps and a rise in sea level
(1) melting of the polar ice caps - Noun phrase
(2) a rise in sea level - Noun phrase
Hence correct parallelism in (E)
26 Mar 2021, 02:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hoozan
Your analysis seems correct to me (I am not aware of what a simple noun is though).
I would strike out A, B and C, because they have a very obvious redundancy issue (possible and may), and then, would focus on parallelism between options D and E.
09 Apr 2021, 10:17
Kudos
Bookmarks
pk6969
When it comes to most SC issues, we tend to get into trouble when we overcomplicate things or rely too much on terminology. For parallelism, it's easiest to think about what general role each element in the construction is playing. If the elements are playing the same general role and seem logical, assume that the parallelism is fine.
For example:
- "On his vacation to Australia, Tim enjoyed swimming with sharks and running great distances."
When you're evaluating the parallelism here, it's enough to see that Tim enjoyed two activities, "swimming" and "running", and that both of those activities are expressed as nouns or noun phrases.
What you don't want to do is start obsessing over whether the prepositional phrase included in the first noun phrase, "with sharks," necessitates another prepositional in the second noun phrase. And you certainly wouldn't want to think, "okay, I've got 'preposition + sea creature' in my first element, so clearly I need 'preposition + sea creature' in my second." Otherwise, you run the risk of forcing Tim to run with whales.
Instead, simplify your approach and emphasize meaning over terminology. Accept that you've got two noun phrases, recognize that the construction is logical, and move on to other issues.
I hope that clears things up!
