Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
A company that designs websites primarily for minority-owned businesses conducted a survey of minority-owned businesses in the United States that do not currently have a website. The survey was designed to help determine what respondents see as the potential benefits of adding a website. The results of that survey are shown in the table.
please see attachment
Question For each of the following conclusions, select Supported if it is supported by the information in the table. Otherwise select Not supported.
How can we assume that ‘’fewer than 25% of 459*26%(119)—or say, in ECB, fewer than 30 also ‘’all’’ believe can PMS....??”
Is there anything I miss out?
Here’s my question point If we try to solve/understand question2 from the opposite side
1. Less than 25%-if here we assume maybe it’s “20%” Then 459*26%=119 119*20%=23.8 ,after rounding it's 24 24people are also all included in the set of group which believe can maintain their market share(459*0.06=28), well, this maybe true/established However, there’s a possibility that all these 24people also belong to a group of people who ‘’all’’ did not believe can maintain their market share-then question2’s assumption will be denied
2. Besides, if the number just fall on ‘’29’’ people, then obviously these 29 people cannot ‘’all’’ be included in ‘’28’’ people of PMS
3. As EMPOWERgmatRichC says Preserve Market Share(PMS) : 28 Respondents Expand Customer Base (ECB): 30 Respondents
In simple terms, is 28 less than 30? YES - it clearly is. This does not change regardless of the number of people who are in "both" groups because the overall totals (28 and 30) will still be the same. You are given EXACT data/numbers to work with here, and no 'hypothetical' situation changes those numbers.
If you add up all of the percentages in the first column, you end up with a total of 110%. That would not happen if each person chose just one reason. Thus, some of those people chose 2 (or more) reasons.-however, will the overlapping must be occur in ECB&PMS , not in other categories???maybe ECB&PMS do not overlap between each us...this is also a possibility
As Spoiler OA, I saw somebody said that Official answer is ‘supported’, well, like other students, I’m really confused about this Official answer, what’s its logic to support this statement as true ,how can you categorically assume this assumption to be true/supported????
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
you have posted this question already a few days ago please don't post duplicate topics here is you previously posted question and please use proper format as i have formatted this one in the link.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.