Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Thought your job leaves no time for GMAT prep? After multiple GMAT attempts and a demanding consulting job, Kshitij improved to 695 in under 2 months. Learn the mindset shifts, study strategy, and execution changes that made the breakthrough possible.
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included. Class starts Saturdays Sept. 26, 2026 - Dec. 19, 2026, 1:00pm-4:00pm ES
" Description: Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thur Sept. 29, 2026 - Dec. 3, 2026, 11:00am-1:00pm EST
Originally posted by Bunuel on 19 Jan 2021, 07:30.
Last edited by Bunuel on 12 Oct 2025, 08:04, edited 9 times in total.
Moved to new forum
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Show timer
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide Answer
Correct Answer
Hide
Show
History
Dropdown 1: ND
Dropdown 2: 5
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the dropdowns below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
29%
(02:56)
correct 71%
(03:13)
wrong
based on 372
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The graph shows state-level changes in corn and soybean acreage in the United States from January 2006 through December 2008.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
The state that experienced the second largest increase in combined corn and soybean acreage during the period shown in the graph was .
The range of change in combined corn and soybean acreage among the states during the period shown in the graph was approximately times the largest increase in soybean acreage of any state during the same period.
The graph shows state-level changes in corn and soybean acreage in the United States from January 2006 through December 2008.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
The state that experienced the second largest increase in combined corn and soybean acreage during the period shown in the graph was .
The range of change in combined corn and soybean acreage among the states during the period shown in the graph was approximately times the largest increase in soybean acreage of any state during the same period.
First, notice that the \(x\)-axis (corn acreage) ranges from -200 to 1,400, while the \(y\)-axis (soybean acreage) ranges from -1,000 to 4,000. Clearly, the state that experienced the largest increase in combined corn and soybean acreage was South Dakota (SD), with a total increase of approximately 1,200 + 200 = 1,400. The second largest increase appears to be in North Dakota (ND), with a net increase of approximately 900 + (-100) = 800.
Drop-down 2:
The range of change in combined corn and soybean acreage can be found by subtracting the largest decrease from the largest increase. The largest increase, as calculated above, was for South Dakota (SD) at 1,400. The largest decrease must be for Illinois (IL), at 750 + (-950) = -200. Thus, the range of change is 1,400 - (-200) = 1,600.
The largest increase in soybean acreage was for Tennessee (TN), at approximately 350.
Therefore, the range of 1,600 is approximately \(\frac{1,600}{350} \approx 5\) times the largest increase in soybean acreage of 350.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.