Last visit was: 17 Sep 2026, 03:47 It is currently 17 Sep 2026, 03:47
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
eka9045
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2019
Last visit: 07 Dec 2023
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
76
 [13]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 36
Kudos: 76
 [13]
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier Updated on: 01 Jul 2019, 05:31
Originally posted by eka9045 on 01 Jul 2019, 05:27.
Last edited by Bunuel on 01 Jul 2019, 05:31, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

43% (01:36) correct 57% (01:39) wrong based on 625 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier writers on space travel, sprang not in a fit of fantasy but evolved from sharp scientific and technical insight, unfettered by arbitrary limitations of the perceptions of his times.

A. Sprang not on a fit of fantasy but evolved from sharp scientific and technical insight
B. Did not spring from fantasy but evolved in sharp scientific and technical insight
C. Sprang not from fantasizing but from sharp scientific and technical insight
D. Did not spring from fantasy but from sharp scientific and technical insight
E. Sprang not from fantasy but out of sharp scientific and technical insight.


SOURCE: T.I.M.E. Institute
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
D
avatar
azoz7
avatar
Joined: 07 May 2016
Last visit: 28 Oct 2019
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
14
Given Kudos: 36
Posts: 38
Kudos: 14
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier 01 Jul 2019, 05:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I always confuse using did not or not. Can someone help me in understanding the difference between C and D?

Thanks

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
goaltop30mba
User avatar
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Last visit: 16 Sep 2026
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
69
 [1]
Given Kudos: 407
Posts: 180
Kudos: 69
 [1]
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier 22 Jul 2019, 22:38
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B is the only options that makes sense to me.. all the other options seem to drift away from the intended meaning... are sprang and evolved redundant??

Experts.. kindly help

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
ASHISH456
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2020
Last visit: 21 Jan 2023
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 84
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier 10 May 2021, 23:13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please help me explain why other options are incorrect
User avatar
Aswin12
User avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2018
Last visit: 28 Jul 2022
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
92
 [2]
Given Kudos: 94
GMAT 1: 620 Q45 V31 (Online)
GMAT 1: 620 Q45 V31 (Online)
Posts: 67
Kudos: 92
 [2]
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier 11 May 2021, 04:48
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I believe the correct idiom usage over here would be "not X but Y" and from must be repeated before both not and but in order to maintain parallelism



Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier writers on space travel, sprang not in a fit of fantasy but evolved from sharp scientific and technical insight, unfettered by arbitrary limitations of the perceptions of his times.

A. Sprang not on a fit of fantasy but evolved from sharp scientific and technical insight - "not in .... but from..." is unidiomatic the parallelism is not maintained
B. Did not spring from fantasy but evolved in sharp scientific and technical insight - "similar error as Option A
C. Sprang not from fantasizing but from sharp scientific and technical insight - Parallelism is not maintained
D. Did not spring from fantasy but from sharp scientific and technical insight - Correct answer
E. Sprang not from fantasy but out of sharp scientific and technical insight. - Parallelism error
avatar
keyuwang
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2021
Last visit: 13 May 2022
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
15
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
GPA: 3.54
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 21
Kudos: 15
 [1]
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier 11 May 2021, 08:15
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Shouldn't X and Y be parallel when we say "Not X but Y"?

In OA - Did not spring from fantasy but from sharp scientific and technical insight

X = spring from fantasy
Y = from sharp scientific and technical insight

Clearly not parallel!!

It would have been right to say...

Spring not from fantasy but from sharp scientific and technical insight

Please advise...
User avatar
AnkithaSrinivas
User avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2020
Last visit: 01 Apr 2022
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
22
Given Kudos: 124
Location: India
Posts: 84
Kudos: 22
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier 11 May 2021, 09:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the only options that obey parallelism are B and D.

but in B it says evolves in, which is wrong
User avatar
arya251294
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2019
Last visit: 16 Mar 2024
Posts: 183
Own Kudos:
64
Given Kudos: 368
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 183
Kudos: 64
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier 06 Jun 2021, 20:01
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
goaltop30mba
B is the only options that makes sense to me.. all the other options seem to drift away from the intended meaning... are sprang and evolved redundant??

Experts.. kindly help

Posted from my mobile device
Show more
Option B is right away wrong IMO as it changes the meaning of the sentence. The question stem says that something evolved from something but option B says evolved in something.
Hope that makes sense
avatar
bnairsurya
avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2016
Last visit: 05 Dec 2021
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 19
Kudos: 3
 [1]
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier 05 Aug 2021, 12:41
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I hate time material. Check out this post in the guardian - https://www.theguardian.com/books/2008/mar/19/arthurcclarke1



Do you see it?
Attachments

Screenshot from 2021-08-06 01-08-19.png
Screenshot from 2021-08-06 01-08-19.png [ 57.85 KiB | Viewed 3994 times ]

User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 938
Own Kudos:
215
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 938
Kudos: 215
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier 22 Aug 2021, 09:39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
eka9045
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier writers on space travel, sprang not in a fit of fantasy but evolved from sharp scientific and technical insight, unfettered by arbitrary limitations of the perceptions of his times.
Show more

A. Sprang not on a fit of fantasy but evolved from sharp scientific and technical insight
not on and evolved from aren't parallel and sprang isn't the right usage

B. Did not spring from fantasy but evolved in sharp scientific and technical insight
eveolved in isn't the right usage therefore out

C. Sprang not from fantasizing but from sharp scientific and technical insight
only issue being that the usage of Sprang did not spring is better

D. Did not spring from fantasy but from sharp scientific and technical insight
parallelism perfect meaning is also perfect therefore let us hang on to it

E. Sprang not from fantasy but out of sharp scientific and technical insight.
but out is akward and cinveys distorted meaning

Therefore IMO D
User avatar
arya251294
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2019
Last visit: 16 Mar 2024
Posts: 183
Own Kudos:
64
Given Kudos: 368
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 183
Kudos: 64
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier 08 Dec 2021, 05:18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
eka9045
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier writers on space travel, sprang not in a fit of fantasy but evolved from sharp scientific and technical insight, unfettered by arbitrary limitations of the perceptions of his times.

A. Sprang not on a fit of fantasy but evolved from sharp scientific and technical insight
B. Did not spring from fantasy but evolved in sharp scientific and technical insight
C. Sprang not from fantasizing but from sharp scientific and technical insight
D. Did not spring from fantasy but from sharp scientific and technical insight
E. Sprang not from fantasy but out of sharp scientific and technical insight.


SOURCE: T.I.M.E. Institute
Show more

This question can be solved by looking out for parallelism but out of curiosity, when should I use "did not spring from" and when should I use "sprang not from".
Is there any difference between the two?

EDIT
From what I read on the internet, it looks like that they both do mean the same, did + past tense is just used for emphasis. There is no grammatical or meaning difference between the two.
Please correct if I am wrong.
User avatar
arya251294
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2019
Last visit: 16 Mar 2024
Posts: 183
Own Kudos:
64
Given Kudos: 368
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 183
Kudos: 64
Sir Arthur Clarke’s imagination and creativity, unlike that of earlier 08 Dec 2021, 05:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
azoz7
I always confuse using did not or not. Can someone help me in understanding the difference between C and D?

Thanks

Posted from my mobile device
Show more

From what I read on the internet, it looks like that they both do mean the same, did + past tense is just used for emphasis. There is no grammatical or meaning difference between the two.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7400 posts
AbhishekP220108
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts