GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Feb 2019, 14:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Online GMAT boot camp for FREE

     February 21, 2019

     February 21, 2019

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Kick off your 2019 GMAT prep with a free 7-day boot camp that includes free online lessons, webinars, and a full GMAT course access. Limited for the first 99 registrants! Feb. 21st until the 27th.
  • Free GMAT RC Webinar

     February 23, 2019

     February 23, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Learn reading strategies that can help even non-voracious reader to master GMAT RC. Saturday, February 23rd at 7 AM PT

Prediction, the hall mark of natural sciences, appears to have been po

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 24 Sep 2018
Posts: 139
Premium Member CAT Tests
Prediction, the hall mark of natural sciences, appears to have been po  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2018, 11:41
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:45) correct 45% (01:58) wrong based on 100 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Prediction, the hall mark of natural sciences, appears to have been possible by reducing phenomena to mathematical expressions. Some social scientists also want the power to predict accurately and assume they ought to perform the same reduction. But this would be a mistake; it would neglect data that are not easily mathematized and thereby would only distort the social phenomena.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?

A. The social sciences do not have as much predictive power as the natural sciences.
B. Mathematics plays a more important role in the natural sciences than it does in the social sciences.
C. There is a need in the social sciences to improve the ability to predict.
D. Phenomena in the social sciences should not be reduced to mathematical formulas.
E. Prediction is responsible for the success of the natural sciences.

_________________

Please award :thumbup: kudos, If this post helped you in someway. :student_man:

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 05 Jul 2018
Posts: 56
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GRE 1: Q162 V149
GPA: 3.6
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
CAT Tests
Re: Prediction, the hall mark of natural sciences, appears to have been po  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2018, 14:12
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 08 Oct 2018
Posts: 41
Location: Russian Federation
GMAT 1: 650 Q35 V44
GPA: 3.8
WE: Consulting (Education)
Re: Prediction, the hall mark of natural sciences, appears to have been po  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2018, 02:12
We can paraphrase the argument: "Natural sciences are good at predicting things, because they reduce phenomena to math expressions. Social sciences want to increase their predictive powers, and thus they want to reduce the phenomena they study to math expressions as well. They shouldn't do that! (conclusion) That would make them ignore data that can't be mathematized."

We now need to choose the answer that most closely mimics the conclusion highlighted in the text. D is the best answer. B, C and E are irrelevant. A can be inferred from the premises, but it's not the conclusion.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Prediction, the hall mark of natural sciences, appears to have been po   [#permalink] 15 Oct 2018, 02:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Prediction, the hall mark of natural sciences, appears to have been po

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.