Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 06:35 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 06:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,416
Own Kudos:
778,508
 [4]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,416
Kudos: 778,508
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Calista_Pro
Joined: 27 Jun 2023
Last visit: 13 Oct 2025
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 158
GMAT Focus 1: 585 Q79 V79 DI79
GMAT Focus 1: 585 Q79 V79 DI79
Posts: 9
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
untillllifoundyou
Joined: 08 Mar 2025
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 71
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,416
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,416
Kudos: 778,508
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Prof. Hernandez's monumental work The History of Central America covers everything about the region from the origin of the Mesoamerican period to the end of the Cold War. While the book has several informative maps and charts, many of the chapters spend less time describing facts and more time explaining Prof. Hernandez's theories. Indeed, the last two chapters consist exclusively of his exposition of theory of the role of Central America in post-WWII world politics. Therefore, properly speaking, this book is not a history book.

Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reasons given for that conclusion?

A. Some history books consist almost exclusively of catalogs of historical facts.

B. Different historians have a different understanding of the relative importance between facts and theories within the study of history.

C. Historians should be more explicit than most are now about the theoretical framework with which they write.

D. History as a discipline is concerned only with historical facts, not with the theoretical explanations of those facts.

E. Most books that present a wealth of historical facts include maps and charts as well.


Magoosh Official Explanation



This argument has the form: evidence, evidence, evidence, and then all of a sudden ... BAM! This book is not a history book. The author must have a strong assumption about what constitutes the discipline of history. In particular, most of the paragraph is about how Prof. Hernandez book contains more theory and fewer facts, and this appears to be the grounds for the judgment. Therefore, we need an assumption that connects a focus on facts to the definition of history.

(D) is the credited response. If it were true that history is concerned only with facts, not theories, this would explain why Prof. Hernandez's theory-heavy book is not a history book. This is the correct assumption. (BTW, outside of this particular question, this is definitely NOT the general assumption in the field if history itself. It sound very much like Prof. Hernandez, and not the author of this argument, really understands how modern historical studies operate.)

(A) and (B) both leave open a variety of interpretations about what constitutes history, so both would allow for classifying Prof. Hernandez's book as a history book.

(C) is more a recommendation than an assumption, and it appears to favor a theoretical approach, which apparently is precisely what the author of this argument finds problematic about Prof. Hernandez's book.

(E) is irrelevant --- it picks up on one small detail of the prompt, and does not address the main issue: what constitutes history as a discipline?
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts