GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Oct 2019, 17:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Jan 2018
Posts: 7
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 May 2018, 04:24
Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Consider X (subordinate clause) Y
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 25 Jan 2018
Posts: 88
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
WE: Business Development (Other)
CAT Tests
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jun 2018, 18:06
abhimahna - Could you please help me out with this one.

Structure of the sentence - Proponents of something consider X Y , while critics denounce X as Z.
Before we go towards reasoning - I am clueless about one point, How can "Censorship Board" take a plural verb. We are not even saying "members of censorship board".I read the reasoning on tone of the sentence to be subjunctive. But subjunctive structure is - <subjunctive keyword > + that + sub + [be form]. (ex - I suggest that the CEO resign). The sentence is far away from this format.How is the plural usage justified here. Kindly clarify.

Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry while critics denounce the relaxations as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.

A) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
--[a1] - it , its , they , them ,there - These pronouns if used should not be pointing to different antecedent in the same sentence. This brings in pronoun ambiguity. Grammatically - them can refer to relaxations as well as production houses. Logically - first them refers to "production houses" and second them refers to relaxations. This is not acceptable. Had only one antecedent logically made sense for them , the sentence would have been correct.

B) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry.
-- [b1] - There is no pronoun ambiguity here with "them". Because even if we have more than one contender for antecedent of them , logically we have a clear winner.No one can give relaxations enough space to make creative piece of work.
-- [b2] - However , we have another issue here. Correct usage is - Consider X Y . Consider X to be Y is incorrect.

C) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
-- Same issue as [a1].

D) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
-- This is the correct choice but I am not clear with allow over allows here.

E) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
-- Same as b2 + construction is a bit lengthy as well.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Apr 2014
Posts: 13
Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jun 2018, 20:30
madhukaramar wrote:
Before we go towards reasoning - I am clueless about one point, How can "Censorship Board" take a plural verb.


You're correct, madhukaramar. In normal English, it would not take a plural verb. In addition, there should probably be a "the" in front of "Censorship Board." Consider this sentence:

"Proponents of the new proposals that Board of Education are planning to discuss next week . . . ."

Nobody would ever say that in real life. Here's what you would say:

"Proponents of the new proposals that the Board of Education is planning to discuss next week . . . ."

Quote:
I read the reasoning on tone of the sentence to be subjunctive. But subjunctive structure is - <subjunctive keyword > + that + sub + [be form]. (ex - I suggest that the CEO resign). The sentence is far away from this format.How is the plural usage justified here. Kindly clarify.


You're right—the subjunctive mood is not used in this sentence. There are five regular verbs in this sentence (not including the infinitives):

allows, consider, denounce, increases, damages

All of these verbs are in the indicative mood, not the subjunctive. So, using "allow" instead of "allows" makes no sense. On the other hand, this would be an example of the correct use of the subjunctive mood:

"Proponents of certain relaxations recommend that the Censorship Board allow production houses to . . . ."

Here's a simpler example:

"The doctor recommends that she exercise half an hour each day."

Anyway, I think this is a terrible question. It needs to be put out to pasture pronto. ;)
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 11 Apr 2018
Posts: 125
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jun 2018, 23:29
Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses to each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry while critics denounce the relaxations as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.


A) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

B) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry.

C) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

D) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

E) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 509
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2018, 17:54
Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry.

I went through all explanation given in thread and I am agree on parallelism error and idiom " consider x y", but I have one doubt in bolded phrase. Insertion of censorship board between relaxation and allow creates problem to me.In my opinion "relaxations that allow" is more clear than "relaxations that censorship board allow".

Moreover, I don't see here subjunctive mood.

"relaxations that censorship board allow" is ambiguous and contentious, I think this is not GMAT type question.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Mar 2018
Posts: 15
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2018, 05:41
Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses to each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry while critics denounce the relaxations as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.

This question requires multiple concepts such as...
1. while usage... While requires parallelism so X does Y while Z does A... In this X and Z must be parallel.
2. nouns are preferred over pronouns. If we have distinction on the basis of noun and pronoun in two sentences then prefer the one with noun .


A) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
Wrong: violation of rule 1.

B) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry.
Wrong: Although this has correct parallelism, it is violating rule 2 W.R.T D(D has noun(Them---> the producers))

C) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
Wrong: Violation of rule 1

D) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
Correct: Parallelism correct, noun> pronoun

E) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry.
Wrong: Violation of Rule 1
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2018
Posts: 41
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2019, 03:26
A and C use ‘them’ to refer to two different nouns. This creates ambiguity and makes A and C bad choices. B has an idiomatic structure problem in the phrase ‘to be vital for the..’ it should be ‘consider relaxations…vital’. E is correct but wordy with the word ‘relaxations’ being repeated. D is correct.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 309
CAT Tests
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2019, 12:29
I am surprised no one really talked about Consider X Y idiom split. Except option D, all other options are unidiomatic!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Nov 2018
Posts: 30
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Feb 2019, 09:46
isnt "allow" for censor board. it should be allows, which is only present in option c
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Jan 2019
Posts: 5
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Feb 2019, 12:28
Dear All, I understand why 'D' has been chosen, since it solves all the parralel issues as well as the grammatical issues. However, I do not understand how this can be correct since it introduces a new object "Producers" in the sentence. The original sentence would mean the production houses are benifitting from the relaxations. However this answer choices introduces producers and implies the producer benifits. Can someone please clarify ?

Many Thanks.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 17
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Feb 2019, 13:07
The correct answer is D and here is my easy way of elimination.

First of all, Proponents of relaxation is wrong subject use. So A,C, and E are out.
Secondly, in B verb for the subject Proponents is missing, whereas you can see that in D the verb 'vital' is used for the subject.
Eg: Proponents consider relaxation ......... vital for the economic growth.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Aug 2012
Posts: 88
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2019, 23:57
Why D is right? There should be "Proponents of". Moreover, consider X to be Y is also a correct idiom.
Please explain if there is any other reason to eliminate E?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house   [#permalink] 15 Jun 2019, 23:57

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 32 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production house

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne