GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 25 Sep 2018, 18:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

QOTD: According to many military historians

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4999
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
QOTD: According to many military historians  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 11:17
2
18
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

74% (01:38) correct 26% (01:46) wrong based on 787 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 20: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here


According to many military historians, Germany’s conquest of the mountainous island of Navarone in the Aegean Sea was of utmost military importance throughout the Second World War because they realized that, if they did not exploit its strategic location, their survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.

(A) they realized that, if they did not exploit its strategic location, their survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.

(B) it realized that, if it did not exploit the island’s strategic location, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.

(C) the nation’s generals realized that, if Navarone’s strategic location was not exploited, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British was always in peril.

(D) they realized that, if Navarone’s strategic location was not exploited, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British was always in peril.

(E) the nation’s generals realized that, if they did not exploit Navarone’s strategic location, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.

_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
How I got into five schools from zero - Applicant Lab Review
Veritas Prep Live Online

Most Helpful Expert Reply
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2033
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: QOTD: According to many military historians  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 11:18
2
4
Quote:
(A) they realized that, if they did not exploit its strategic location, their survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.

"They" and "their" can't possibly refer to "Germany's", since "Germany's" is a singular, possessive noun. So I guess "they" and "their" must refer to historians, and that makes no sense at all. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
(B) it realized that, if it did not exploit the island’s strategic location, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.

"It" has no clear antecedent here, either. "Germany's" is possessive, and the subject pronoun "it" can't refer back to a possessive antecedent. Plus, it's awfully weird to say that "Germany realized" something. (B) is gone.

Quote:
(C) the nation’s generals realized that, if Navarone’s strategic location was not exploited, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British was always in peril.

I like the use of "the nation's generals", but the last chunk of the sentence is an if/then statement, and we need to use the conditional "would" instead of "was." (C) can be eliminated.

Quote:
(D) they realized that, if Navarone’s strategic location was not exploited, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British was always in peril.

This has the same pronoun problem as (B), along with the verb form problem that appears in (C).

Quote:
(E) the nation’s generals realized that, if they did not exploit Navarone’s strategic location, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.

Much better! The verb is in the proper form, and the only pronoun in the underlined portion, "they", refers nicely back to the nation's generals. (E) is our answer.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Posts: 46
Location: India
GPA: 3.7
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: QOTD: According to many military historians  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 20:56
E

A,B & D are out because the non underlined part says germany's conquest.

C is wrong becoz of incorrect usage of IF clause.

Correct me if i am wrong.

thanks
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4033
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: QOTD: According to many military historians  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2017, 23:21
souvik101990 wrote:
According to many military historians, Germany’s conquest of the mountainous island of Navarone in the Aegean Sea was of utmost military importance throughout the Second World War because they realized that, if they did not exploit its strategic location, their survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.

(A) they realized that, if they did not exploit its strategic location, their survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.

(B) it realized that, if it did not exploit the island’s strategic location, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.

(C) the nation’s generals realized that, if Navarone’s strategic location was not exploited, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British was always in peril.

(D) they realized that, if Navarone’s strategic location was not exploited, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British was always in peril.

(E) the nation’s generals realized that, if they did not exploit Navarone’s strategic location, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.


IMHO , Correct answer must be (D) , errors in other options highlighted in RED above...
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Retired Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 546
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Premium Member
Re: QOTD: According to many military historians  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 May 2017, 01:00
According to many military historians, Germany’s conquest of the mountainous island of Navarone in the Aegean Sea was of utmost military importance throughout the Second World War because they realized that, if they did not exploit its strategic location, their survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.

(A) they realized that, if they did not exploit its strategic location, their survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril. - Antecedent of the pronoun is ambiguous

(B) it realized that, if it did not exploit the island’s strategic location, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril. Antecedent of the pronoun is ambiguous

(C) the nation’s generals realized that, if Navarone’s strategic location was not exploited, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British was always in peril. - If past, then would is preferred - incorrect usage in second part of the clause - "was always in peril" distorts the meaning

(D) they realized that, if Navarone’s strategic location was not exploited, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British was always in peril. - Same error as C

(E) the nation’s generals realized that, if they did not exploit Navarone’s strategic location, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril. - Corrects the error in C and removes any pronoun ambiguity.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Jul 2017
Posts: 59
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GPA: 3.87
Re: QOTD: According to many military historians  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Nov 2017, 10:08
According to many military historians, Germany’s conquest of the mountainous island of Navarone in the Aegean Sea was of utmost military importance throughout the Second World War because they realized that, if they did not exploit its strategic location, their survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril.

(A) they realized that, if they did not exploit its strategic location, their survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril. - what are these pronouns referencing back to? Military historians? Doesn't make logical sense.

(B) it realized that, if it did not exploit the island’s strategic location, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril. - what does "it" refer back to? Germany? Unclear.

(C) the nation’s generals realized that, if Navarone’s strategic location was not exploited, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British was always in peril. - "Was" should be "would"

(D) they realized that, if Navarone’s strategic location was not exploited, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British was always in peril. - another pronoun that doesn't reference back to a logical antecedent

(E) the nation’s generals realized that, if they did not exploit Navarone’s strategic location, Germany’s survival against the indomitable naval might of the British would always be in peril. - the issue of confusing pronouns is eliminated by using "the nation's generals"; "would" is correctly used
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 01 Feb 2017
Posts: 155
Re: QOTD: According to many military historians  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2018, 12:56
GMATNinja

Regarding Choice E, Could you please advise whether the usage of "would" (expectation/possibility) + "always" is logical.

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Sep 2017
Posts: 10
Re: QOTD: According to many military historians  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2018, 06:52
I chose C :(

I was making a lot of mistakes whenever there is if-then in the middle of some big sentence or in complex sentences.

I have created a sheet for myself which has common scenarios of if-then usage and their following clause. GMATNinja could you please help me validate these and is the way to go while handling if-thens. With me, whenever the sentence correction question is a long long sentence, I take a lot of time to read and understand.

If clause has resent tense---> The Main clause will have the present tense or future tense depending on the context.

If clause has present continuous/present perfect----> Main clause will have simple future. (will/shall)

If clause has past tense/past continuous----> could/should/would (Like the one in the question)

If clause has past perfect-----> could have /would have / might have.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2033
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: QOTD: According to many military historians  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2018, 20:38
namita_am wrote:
I chose C :(

I was making a lot of mistakes whenever there is if-then in the middle of some big sentence or in complex sentences.

I have created a sheet for myself which has common scenarios of if-then usage and their following clause. GMATNinja could you please help me validate these and is the way to go while handling if-thens. With me, whenever the sentence correction question is a long long sentence, I take a lot of time to read and understand.

If clause has resent tense---> The Main clause will have the present tense or future tense depending on the context.

If clause has present continuous/present perfect----> Main clause will have simple future. (will/shall)

If clause has past tense/past continuous----> could/should/would (Like the one in the question)

If clause has past perfect-----> could have /would have / might have.

I don't think this particular construction should be a major part of your SC prep, but yes, your understanding of the various if/then cases seems to be correct. Personally, if I'm trying to internalize some rule or construction, I'd produce some specific examples that I could quickly eyeball to refresh my memory.

    1) If I fall down the stairs, I will spill my cocktail.
    2) If I bought a burrito from that unlicensed food truck, I would likely experience unpleasant indigestion.
    3) If I had paid my taxes, I wouldn't have ended up sharing a cell with Tim, whose face tattoo was oddly beguiling.

And now, I'm just having fun with sentences. :)

So yes, you're on the right track, but I would argue that it's a relatively minor issue on the GMAT.

I hope this helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

GMAT Club Bot
Re: QOTD: According to many military historians &nbs [#permalink] 18 Jul 2018, 20:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

QOTD: According to many military historians

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.