GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 25 Sep 2018, 06:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

QOTD: Although the discount stores in Goreville central

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4999
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
QOTD: Although the discount stores in Goreville central  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2017, 15:40
1
15
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

66% (04:09) correct 34% (02:10) wrong based on 653 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Although the discount stores in Goreville central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long. In the five years since the opening of Colson's, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson's.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Many customers of Colson's are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened.

(B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson's opened have been discount stores.

(C) At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.

(D) Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville's population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.

(E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson's.


Verbal Question of The Day: Day 134: Critical Reasoning


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here

_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
How I got into five schools from zero - Applicant Lab Review
Veritas Prep Live Online

Most Helpful Expert Reply
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2028
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: QOTD: Although the discount stores in Goreville central  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2017, 15:41
10
3
There is actually a town called Goreville with about 1,000 people in Illinois! I don't think that there are many discount stores left in downtown Goreville, but I hear that there's a pretty good Mexican restaurant, with great enchiladas rancheros. But the GMAT probably doesn't care about Mexican food, so let's focus on this stinking passage:

The conclusion is that when the discount stores in Goreville close due to competition with SpendLess, their locations will not stay vacant for long (in other words, those locations will be filled by new stores or something else).

The author then presents evidence supporting that conclusion. When Colson's opened, some stores (we don't know how many) closed because they could not compete with Colson's. Within five years, a new store opened at the location of each of the closed stores.

Based on the Colson's example, the author argues that the same thing will happen when SpendLess opens. But are these two examples comparable? Is the evidence based on Colson's, a nondiscount department store, relevant to a discount department store like SpendLess? Can the conclusion be properly be drawn based on that evidence?

We need to find an answer choice that weakens the author's argument:

Quote:
A. Many customers of Colson's are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened.

This doesn't tell us anything about the stores that will close due to competition with SpendLess. Will their locations remain vacant? Choice (A) doesn't give us any indication either way, so it can be eliminated.

Quote:
B. Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson's opened have been discount stores.

After Colson's opened, the vacant locations became discount stores that did not have to compete with Colson's (since Colson's is a nondiscount store). But now we have both a discount department store AND a nondiscount department store. So when the stores competing with SpendLess close, they can't be easily replaced with nondiscount stores (since we already have a Colson's that drove such stores out of business).

This information is evidence that it will be more difficult to fill the new vacancies than it was after Colson's opened. This weakens the author's argument, so keep (B).

Quote:
C. At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.

This does not tell us what will happen when several of the discount stores close because of competition with SpendLess. Will those vacancies be filled? Choice (C) doesn't strengthen or weaken the author's argument, so it can be eliminated.

Quote:
D. Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville's population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.

This might actually strengthen the author's argument. If there are more people, there might be a demand for more stores. That might make it easier to fill the vacancies. Regardless, this certainly doesn't weaken the author's argument, so (D) can be eliminated.

Quote:
E. Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson's.

All we know is that the discount stores that compete with SpendLess are going to close, and we need information suggesting that those vacancies will or will not stay vacant for long. Choice (E) just tells us that Goreville has a variety of other stores. Perhaps if we were told that there was a demand for MORE of those types of stores then we could argue that the vacancies could be filled with stores that sell such merchandise (strengthening the argument). As is, choice (E) does not suggest whether the vacancies will be filled, so (E) can be eliminated.

Choice (B) is the best answer.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Jul 2017
Posts: 21
Re: QOTD: Although the discount stores in Goreville central  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2017, 23:47
1
A.
I am quite confused with the question

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

I am alive, because I have a dream
Give kudos if it helped. Comment if I am wrong to help me learn more.

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1131
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
CAT Tests
Re: QOTD: Although the discount stores in Goreville central  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2017, 01:34
3
Awaiting OA. My answer B

Although the discount stores in Goreville central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long. In the five years since the opening of Colson's, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson's.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Many customers of Colson's are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened. -Even if the cutomers do less shopping than before, it doesn't explain that why the locations will stay vacant for long after the opening of spend less store.
B. Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson's opened have been discount stores. -Correct. If the stores that opened in place of the closed stores when Colson's opened were discount stores, then there is very less chance that any more stores will open.
C. At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had. -Out of scope
D. Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville's population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades. -Out of scope
E. Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson's. -They sell the clothes right now, but this statement doesn't help explain as to why the locations will stay vacant for long.
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!


Preparing for RC my way


My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Director
Director
User avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 501
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.33
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: QOTD: Although the discount stores in Goreville central  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Oct 2017, 01:18
+1 for B. Ask yourself what do we need to do to weaken the argument. The conclusion states that location will not stay empty for long. What if the new stores that open up are all discount stores ?? Then their chances of survival comes down because of competition. Hence option B
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 16 Jan 2018
Posts: 94
Location: New Zealand
Premium Member
Re: QOTD: Although the discount stores in Goreville central  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2018, 00:29
Quote:
After Colson's opened, the vacant locations became discount stores that did not have to compete with Colson's (since Colson's is a nondiscount store). But now we have both a discount department store AND a nondiscount department store. So when the stores competing with SpendLess close, they can't be easily replaced with nondiscount stores (since we already have a Colson's that drove such stores out of business).

This information is evidence that it will be more difficult to fill the new vacancies than it was after Colson's opened. This weakens the author's argument, so keep (B).


GMATNinja i had trouble trying to understand the argument. Thanks for the wonderful explanation.

So when Colson's opened up, all the ND stores closed as they couldn't compete with it, and the discount stores took their vacant spots. Argument uses this phenomenon to predict a similar scenario that when Spendless opens, 1. The discount stores will not be able to compete with it, and thus vacate. & 2. New stores will open up just as they did when colson's showed up.

The new shops-whether ND or Discount-daring to open will have to compete with both Colson's and Spendless. So, it won't be easy.

I get it now :-)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: QOTD: Although the discount stores in Goreville central &nbs [#permalink] 20 Aug 2018, 00:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

QOTD: Although the discount stores in Goreville central

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.