Last visit was: 15 Jun 2025, 14:39 It is currently 15 Jun 2025, 14:39
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 Level|   Weaken|                                       
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,066
Own Kudos:
2,118
 [4]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,066
Kudos: 2,118
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kornn
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 832
Posts: 360
Kudos: 91
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
HaileyCusimano
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 15 Aug 2017
Last visit: 15 Jun 2025
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
671
 [1]
Given Kudos: 77
GMAT 1: 780 Q49 V51
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 780 Q49 V51
Posts: 78
Kudos: 671
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,312
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,312
Kudos: 922
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vnigam21
mikemcgarry, can you please explain this question in detail. Even the argument is NOT clear to me. I tried many times but failed.

(A) Many customers of Colson's are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened.
Customer shopping is not related whether shops would open or not


(B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson's opened have been discount stores.
1B/1A not same condition :
Non discount is colson ; and new open are discount stores
Spendless is discount store,
See the pictures:
1st multiple non-discount stores came then Colson came which was non –discount and made closed multiple non-discount stores due to competition
then came discount stores in different stream to thrive, then spendless discount came then it will kill all existing discount stores,,what would happen next?
What kind of new stores can come as market has already discount and non –discount stores.

(C) At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.
>>it doesn’t answer our question that whether new locations would not be empty

(D) Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville's population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.
Like A, it doesn’t matter to consumers increase

(E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson's
>> it doesn’t tell me whether these stores are new ones, old ones or closed ones?
Without this information it is hard to conclude
Attachments

Question.jpg
Question.jpg [ 869.21 KiB | Viewed 5639 times ]

analysis.jpg
analysis.jpg [ 502.74 KiB | Viewed 5618 times ]

User avatar
aakritibirla11
Joined: 10 Jan 2024
Last visit: 24 Apr 2025
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 416
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q84 V81 DI79
GPA: 2.76
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q84 V81 DI79
Posts: 16
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
is it just me or can everyone hear Charles' voice while reading this? :lol:
GMATNinja
There is actually a town called Goreville with about 1,000 people in Illinois! I don't think that there are many discount stores left in downtown Goreville, but I hear that there's a pretty good Mexican restaurant, with great enchiladas rancheros. But the GMAT probably doesn't care about Mexican food, so let's focus on this stinking passage:

The conclusion is that when the discount stores in Goreville close due to competition with SpendLess, their locations will not stay vacant for long (in other words, those locations will be filled by new stores or something else).

The author then presents evidence supporting that conclusion. When Colson's opened, some stores (we don't know how many) closed because they could not compete with Colson's. Within five years, a new store opened at the location of each of the closed stores.

Based on the Colson's example, the author argues that the same thing will happen when SpendLess opens. But are these two examples comparable? Is the evidence based on Colson's, a nondiscount department store, relevant to a discount department store like SpendLess? Can the conclusion be properly be drawn based on that evidence?

We need to find an answer choice that weakens the author's argument:

Quote:
A. Many customers of Colson's are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened.
This doesn't tell us anything about the stores that will close due to competition with SpendLess. Will their locations remain vacant? Choice (A) doesn't give us any indication either way, so it can be eliminated.

Quote:
B. Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson's opened have been discount stores.
After Colson's opened, the vacant locations became discount stores that did not have to compete with Colson's (since Colson's is a nondiscount store). But now we have both a discount department store AND a nondiscount department store. So when the stores competing with SpendLess close, they can't be easily replaced with nondiscount stores (since we already have a Colson's that drove such stores out of business).

This information is evidence that it will be more difficult to fill the new vacancies than it was after Colson's opened. This weakens the author's argument, so keep (B).

Quote:
C. At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.
This does not tell us what will happen when several of the discount stores close because of competition with SpendLess. Will those vacancies be filled? Choice (C) doesn't strengthen or weaken the author's argument, so it can be eliminated.

Quote:
D. Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville's population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.
This might actually strengthen the author's argument. If there are more people, there might be a demand for more stores. That might make it easier to fill the vacancies. Regardless, this certainly doesn't weaken the author's argument, so (D) can be eliminated.

Quote:
E. Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson's.
All we know is that the discount stores that compete with SpendLess are going to close, and we need information suggesting that those vacancies will or will not stay vacant for long. Choice (E) just tells us that Goreville has a variety of other stores. Perhaps if we were told that there was a demand for MORE of those types of stores then we could argue that the vacancies could be filled with stores that sell such merchandise (strengthening the argument). As is, choice (E) does not suggest whether the vacancies will be filled, so (E) can be eliminated.

Choice (B) is the best answer.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7325 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts