GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Aug 2018, 15:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 May 2014
Posts: 1
RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 28 Jun 2017, 20:27
8
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

65% (02:12) correct 35% (02:22) wrong based on 343

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

57% (00:40) correct 43% (00:33) wrong based on 354

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

78% (00:20) correct 22% (00:34) wrong based on 342

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

52% (01:15) correct 48% (01:01) wrong based on 340

HideShow timer Statistics

Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has nevertheless prompted debate among physicists. The debate arose because quantum theory addresses the peculiar properties of minute objects such as photons and electrons. While one type of experiment shows that these objects behave like particles, with well-defined trajectories through space, another demonstrates that, on the contrary, they behave like waves, their peaks and troughs producing characteristic “interference” effects. However, scientists have failed to devise an experiment to demonstrate both behaviors simultaneously.

In the 1920s, two alternate interpretations of quantum theory attempted to resolve this apparently contradictory wave-particle duality. Physicists Niel Bohr argued that wave particle properties are not contradictory, but complementary. Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, he concluded that the physical reality of a quantum objects is actually determined before the object is observed via experiment.

Physicists Werner Heisenberg's “uncertainty principle”, by contrast, postulated that we cannot precisely determine two complementary properties, such as position and momentum, of a quantum object simultaneously: if we measure an object's position with absolute certainty, then there is an infinite uncertainty in its momentum, and vice versa. He concluded that although we are limited in our ability to measure objects at the atomic and subatomic levels, their position and momentum are nonetheless defined all along.

1) Which of the following does the passage mention as providing evidence of the dual nature of quantum objects?

a) Scientists' inability to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects simultaneously.
b) Scientists' inability to measure the momentum of the quantum objects with certainty.
c) The similarities in the appearance of particles and waves.
d) The tendency of quantum objects to exhibit well-defined trajectories only at either extremely high or extremely low speeds.
e) The behavior of quantum objects as either particles or waves depending on the type of experiment that is performed.


2) It can be inferred from the passage that if scientists were able to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects precisely and simultaneously, then the

a) theory that the dual properties of quantum objects are complementary would be proven.
b) basic postulate of the uncertainty principle would be refuted
c) distinction between particle behavior would cease to exist
d) debate about quantum theory among physicists would be unchanged.
e) trajectories of quantum objects through space would be more difficult to predict.


3) All of the following are mentioned in the passage as possible characteristics of quantum objects except:

a) a minute size
b) momentum
c) position in space
d) sporadic movement
e) wave like behavior


4) Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine Bohr's conclusion about the physical reality of a quantum object?

a) The physical properties of particles and waves are inherently complementary.
b) Human intuition is not a factor in the interpretation of scientific data about quantum objects.
c) Results of experiments on quantum objects are sometime influenced by the expectations of the experiments.
d) The technology used in research on quantum objects has made tremendous advances since the 1920s.
e) Quantum objects posses distinct, continuously existing physical forms that do not depend on the experiments used to measure them


Originally posted by pragyakeshap on 04 Jul 2015, 01:56.
Last edited by hazelnut on 28 Jun 2017, 20:27, edited 3 times in total.
Added OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Posts: 73
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2015, 11:16
1. confused b/w a & e
2. b
3. d
4. e
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 500
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2015, 21:42
Hi,
I have formatted the Paragraph, please follow forum guidelines for future posts.
10 mins , all correct.
Regards.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards :)

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2014
Posts: 84
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Consumer Products)
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2015, 10:16
1.E
2.A
3.D
4.B

Pls provide OA
_________________

Your first step to your dream MBA
https://mbamiss.wordpress.com/blog/

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2014
Posts: 84
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Consumer Products)
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2015, 10:22
:shock: The OA are :

E,B,D,E
_________________

Your first step to your dream MBA
https://mbamiss.wordpress.com/blog/

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Feb 2016
Posts: 97
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 690 Q42 V47
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V39
GPA: 3.57
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Dec 2016, 23:27
I didn't understand the 2nd paragraph so got the final one wrong.:(
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Apr 2015
Posts: 2
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
Schools: Boston U '19
GMAT 1: 570 Q47 V21
GPA: 3
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2017, 08:47
I chose B for Question 4 because the second paragraph mentions that "Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to ..." so that if human intuition is not a factor in the interpretation, Bohr's interpretation makes no sense.

What's wrong in my explanation?

About the answer E, I don't understand because the 2nd paragraph just says "... is observed via experiment", which does not mean the experiment affects the physical forms of the objects.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Sep 2017
Posts: 15
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q46 V26
GPA: 3.9
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Dec 2017, 01:26
1
Could you please explain why the answer for the 4th question is E?
I chose B.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1909
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2017, 20:21
1
1
baanhgraduate wrote:
I chose B for Question 4 because the second paragraph mentions that "Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to ..." so that if human intuition is not a factor in the interpretation, Bohr's interpretation makes no sense.

What's wrong in my explanation?

About the answer E, I don't understand because the 2nd paragraph just says "... is observed via experiment", which does not mean the experiment affects the physical forms of the objects.

ADiCR7 wrote:
Could you please explain why the answer for the 4th question is E?
I chose B.

Quote:
4) Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine Bohr's conclusion about the physical reality of a quantum object?

a) The physical properties of particles and waves are inherently complementary.
b) Human intuition is not a factor in the interpretation of scientific data about quantum objects.
c) Results of experiments on quantum objects are sometime influenced by the expectations of the experiments.
d) The technology used in research on quantum objects has made tremendous advances since the 1920s.
e) Quantum objects posses distinct, continuously existing physical forms that do not depend on the experiments used to measure them

Bohr's conclusion was "that the physical reality of a quantum object is actually determined before the object is observed via experiment." Even though this CONCLUSION is contrary to human intuition, Bohr's does NOT suggest that human intuition is not a factor in INTERPRETING scientific data. Human intuition might be used to interpret the data, and that analysis might yield CONCLUSIONS that are contrary to our intuition. Thus, choice (B) is not appropriate.

Bohr's conclusion is CONTRARY to the intuitive idea "that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it." Choice (E) says that the objects possess "distinct, continuously existing physical forms." Thus, choice (E) supports the intuitive idea. Since Bohr's conclusion OPPOSES the intuitive idea, choice (E) undermines Bohr's conclusion.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 25 Jul 2017
Posts: 38
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2017, 01:05
Hi all,

I found another question for this passage. Could you please help me explain why correct option is B. Thanks.

Question: The passage suggests that the debate among physicists mentioned in the first sentence has arisen in part because:
A: the rapid movement of quantum objects poses an insurmountable obstacle to precise measurement
B: scientists have been unable to devise a single experiment that reveals both particle and wave properties of quantum objects simultaneously
C: the controversial nature of quantum theory has made it for scientists to agree on what evidence is acceptable
D: division among physicists has resulted in the design of experiments that produce unintelligible experimental results
E: research efforts have been undermined by irreconcilable contradictions between equally compelling interpretations of quantum theory
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 519
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2017, 02:30
1
thingocanhnguyen wrote:
Hi all,

I found another question for this passage. Could you please help me explain why correct option is B. Thanks.

Question: The passage suggests that the debate among physicists mentioned in the first sentence has arisen in part because:
A: the rapid movement of quantum objects poses an insurmountable obstacle to precise measurement
B: scientists have been unable to devise a single experiment that reveals both particle and wave properties of quantum objects simultaneously
C: the controversial nature of quantum theory has made it for scientists to agree on what evidence is acceptable
D: division among physicists has resulted in the design of experiments that produce unintelligible experimental results
E: research efforts have been undermined by irreconcilable contradictions between equally compelling interpretations of quantum theory

From passage:
While one type of experiment shows that these objects behave like particles, with well-defined trajectories through space, another demonstrates that, on the contrary, they behave like waves,their peaks and troughs producing characteristic “interference” effects. However, scientists have failed to devise an experiment to demonstrate both behaviors simultaneously.

The entire passage revolves around the confusion in the behavior of p&e (protons and electrons : Quantum particles)- "Does the Quantum particles exhibit charateristics of Wave or Particle"
If the scientists were able to demonstrate that p&e behaves as both wave and particle , then there would not have been any confusion.
--B--
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq :)

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Posts: 27
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2018, 04:39
Hi . Can anyone please justify the first question . I selected A as answer .
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1909
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jan 2018, 18:54
ashisplb wrote:
Hi . Can anyone please justify the first question . I selected A as answer .

Quote:
1) Which of the following does the passage mention as providing evidence of the dual nature of quantum objects?

a) Scientists' inability to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects simultaneously.
b) Scientists' inability to measure the momentum of the quantum objects with certainty.
c) The similarities in the appearance of particles and waves.
d) The tendency of quantum objects to exhibit well-defined trajectories only at either extremely high or extremely low speeds.
e) The behavior of quantum objects as either particles or waves depending on the type of experiment that is performed.

The passage does mention scientists' inability to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects simultaneously (choice A), but this does not represent evidence of the dual nature of quantum objects. Such evidence is presented in the first paragraph: "one type of experiment shows that [quantum] objects behave like particles" and "another [type of experiment] demonstrates that, on the contrary, [quantum objects] behave like waves". This corresponds to choice (E). This evidence demonstrates that quantum objects can behave like 1) waves and 2) particles and thus demonstrates the dual nature of quantum objects.

I hope that helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Nov 2016
Posts: 64
Location: India
RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 12 Aug 2018, 08:31
Hi Verbal Experts (@GMATNinja),

Could you please explain Q.2. in detail. I am badly stuck among options A, B, and D and am not able to eliminate 2 out of these 3 options.

Thanks in advance! :-)

Originally posted by SidJainGMAT on 12 Aug 2018, 08:26.
Last edited by SidJainGMAT on 12 Aug 2018, 08:31, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Nov 2016
Posts: 64
Location: India
RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2018, 08:29
pragyakeshap wrote:
Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has nevertheless prompted debate among physicists. The debate arose because quantum theory addresses the peculiar properties of minute objects such as photons and electrons. While one type of experiment shows that these objects behave like particles, with well-defined trajectories through space, another demonstrates that, on the contrary, they behave like waves, their peaks and troughs producing characteristic “interference” effects. However, scientists have failed to devise an experiment to demonstrate both behaviors simultaneously.

In the 1920s, two alternate interpretations of quantum theory attempted to resolve this apparently contradictory wave-particle duality. Physicists Niel Bohr argued that wave particle properties are not contradictory, but complementary. Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, he concluded that the physical reality of a quantum objects is actually determined before the object is observed via experiment.

Physicists Werner Heisenberg's “uncertainty principle”, by contrast, postulated that we cannot precisely determine two complementary properties, such as position and momentum, of a quantum object simultaneously: if we measure an object's position with absolute certainty, then there is an infinite uncertainty in its momentum, and vice versa. He concluded that although we are limited in our ability to measure objects at the atomic and subatomic levels, their position and momentum are nonetheless defined all along.
1) Which of the following does the passage mention as providing evidence of the dual nature of quantum objects?

a) Scientists' inability to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects simultaneously.
b) Scientists' inability to measure the momentum of the quantum objects with certainty.
c) The similarities in the appearance of particles and waves.
d) The tendency of quantum objects to exhibit well-defined trajectories only at either extremely high or extremely low speeds.
e) The behavior of quantum objects as either particles or waves depending on the type of experiment that is performed.


2) It can be inferred from the passage that if scientists were able to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects precisely and simultaneously, then the

a) theory that the dual properties of quantum objects are complementary would be proven.
b) basic postulate of the uncertainty principle would be refuted
c) distinction between particle behavior would cease to exist
d) debate about quantum theory among physicists would be unchanged.
e) trajectories of quantum objects through space would be more difficult to predict.


3) All of the following are mentioned in the passage as possible characteristics of quantum objects except:

a) a minute size
b) momentum
c) position in space
d) sporadic movement
e) wave like behavior


4) Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine Bohr's conclusion about the physical reality of a quantum object?

a) The physical properties of particles and waves are inherently complementary.
b) Human intuition is not a factor in the interpretation of scientific data about quantum objects.
c) Results of experiments on quantum objects are sometime influenced by the expectations of the experiments.
d) The technology used in research on quantum objects has made tremendous advances since the 1920s.
e) Quantum objects posses distinct, continuously existing physical forms that do not depend on the experiments used to measure them



Hi GMATNinja,

Could you please explain Q.2. in detail. I am badly stuck among options A, B, and D and am not able to eliminate 2 out of these 3 options.

Thanks in advance! :-)
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Jun 2018
Posts: 13
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Aug 2018, 00:31
grr8pe wrote:
1. confused b/w a & e
2. b
3. d
4. e


a is an alternate interpretation of the duality theory whereas e is the evidence because from some experiments we can conclude that quantum objects behave like a wave, and from other that they have particle characteristics. so thats duality.
Re: RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific &nbs [#permalink] 13 Aug 2018, 00:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

RC Question pack - Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.