EMPOWERgmatRichC wrote:
Hi jshunnar,
The scoring algorithm on the Official GMAT is far more complicated than most people realize. It takes into account a number of different factors - far more than just the number of correct and incorrect answers (and there's also the issue of the 'experimental' questions - the ones that don't count; getting all of those questions correct would have NO impact on your score). As such, you shouldn't be spending time trying to figure it all out.
A far more useful gauge would be to review each CAT and determine how many questions you SHOULD have gotten correct, but didn't (due to a silly/little mistake). Those mistakes are the things that you have to fix to score at a higher level.
1) How long have you been studying?
2) How have you scored on your other CATs (including the Quant and Verbal Scaled Score)?
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Rich, I believe the puzzling part is that OP did mention that there were
only 3 mistakes in the first 23 questions. Regardless on how the mistakes were distributed (only 3 mind you) between the 23 questions, don't you believe that by the 15th or 18th question, the level of questions would have been quite difficult?
I reviewed my past GMAT prep exam and I did far more mistakes in the first 20 questions and yet I ended up with a V36.
I understand that the number of questions wrong is not that relevant to the score but I don't think OP's score makes that much sense. I also believe that practice tests do not include questions that don't count.
I am not looking for a response explaining how the algorithm works as we all know that its complicated for anyone from the outside to comprehend. However, I am more concerned about the test takers that take the real GMAT and face the same situation as OP's.