GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 27 Feb 2020, 19:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Bell the GMAT!!!
Affiliations: Aidha
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 125
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V27
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
WE: Other (Other)
Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2011, 06:47
11
3
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (02:01) correct 44% (02:10) wrong based on 419 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce good food from bad soil, maintain good soil without good farming, or have good farming without a culture that places value on the proper maintenance of all its natural resources so that needed supplies are always available.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Rosen's statement?

(A) The creation of good meals depends on both natural and cultural conditions.
(B) Natural resources cannot be maintained properly without good farming practices.
(C) Good soil is a prerequisite of good farming.
(D) Any society with good cultural values will have a good cuisine.
(E) When food is bad, it is because of poor soil and, ultimately, bad farming practices.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1514
Re: LSAT CR: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2011, 09:15
5
1
GMATmission wrote:
Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce good food from bad soil, maintain good soil without good farming, or have good farming without a culture that places value on the proper maintenance of all its natural resources so that needed supplies are always available.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Rosen's statement?

NO Culture->NOT(Good Farming)->NOT(Good Soil)->(NOT)Good Food->(NOT)Good Meal

(A) The creation of good meals depends on both natural and cultural conditions.
Yes. It does. Good Meal comes at the end. It depends on everything prior to that. Let's rule out others.

(B) Natural resources cannot be maintained properly without good farming practices.
We know only reverse is true:NO Culture->NOT(Good Farming).

(C) Good soil is a prerequisite of good farming.
Again. Opposite.

(D) Any society with good cultural values will have a good cuisine.
For Having a good meal- at least ALL in the chain must be true, but just their mere presence won't necessarily make good cuisine. There may be other requirements for a good cuisine that's not mentioned in the passage. Remember, we need Must be true, not May be true.

(E) When food is bad, it is because of poor soil and, ultimately, bad farming practices.
Could be; but not necessarily true. Food could be bad because of natural calamity, who knows. We just know that if the food is GOOD; at least everything in the chain is TRUE.

Ans: "A"
##### General Discussion
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 346
Location: United States (MA)

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2011, 07:38
3
Its A.

Why is it tough? A is the first thing you think when you finis reading the given paragraph.
Manager
Status: Bell the GMAT!!!
Affiliations: Aidha
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 125
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V27
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
WE: Other (Other)

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2011, 07:45
piyatiwari wrote:
Its A.

Why is it tough? A is the first thing you think when you finis reading the given paragraph.

I am glad it is not tough for you. It was for me atleast. Anyways, can you help me with explanations for why option A is correct and why all others are wrong.

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 346
Location: United States (MA)

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2011, 12:48
2
Sorry, I did not mean to say in wrong way. Trust me. I was just wondering if there could be another obvious way to look at the given info.

Anyway.

In case of inferrence questions, always go for a option which tells you the 'meat' of the given info. I hope you get what I meant to say. So considering this, the given argument tells us that, the good meal is equally dependent on good natural sources (food -> soil ) as well as cultural sources (such as farming techniques).

Now,

A. The creation of good meals depends on both natural and cultural conditions. - Correct
B. Natural resources cannot be maintained properly without good farming practices. - Given info did not say this.
C. Good soil is a prerequisite of good farming. - One of the permises
D. Any society with good cultural values will have a good cuisine. - not necessary, need good natural sources as well
E. When food is bad, its because of poor soil and ultimately, bad farming practices - Given info did not say this.

[Always avoid options that are too extreme, make un-necessary assumptions, use information other than given]
Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 43

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2011, 18:51
I pick A.

Unlike the previous poster, I did not find the answer so obvious.

Options B,D and E are wrong because their claims are not necessarily supported by the question stem.

C seems to reverse the premise. Good farming is necessary for good soil. Not the other way around.

A does not have any of those problems.

It took me 87 seconds to get this right. Now, that is a disappointment! Shorter CRs should be completed within 60 seconds.
Intern
Status: Accepted - SMU, Singapore (Class of 2013)
Joined: 08 Sep 2011
Posts: 23
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2011, 08:36
I did exactly DexDee's way but took almost 2 mins...
CR questions are not in my reach within a minute... my strategy is to target 2 mins for a CR ques and 1 min for a SC ques. Seems to work fine for me
Manager
Status: Head Turner ! am I ?
Affiliations: RHCE , CCNA, MCSE and Now GMAT ;)
Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Posts: 124
Location: India
WE: Operations (Computer Hardware)
Re: LSAT CR: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2011, 08:58
fluke wrote:
GMATmission wrote:
Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce good food from bad soil, maintain good soil without good farming, or have good farming without a culture that places value on the proper maintenance of all its natural resources so that needed supplies are always available.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Rosen's statement?

NO Culture->NOT(Good Farming)->NOT(Good Soil)->(NOT)Good Food->(NOT)Good Meal

(A) The creation of good meals depends on both natural and cultural conditions.
Yes. It does. Good Meal comes at the end. It depends on everything prior to that. Let's rule out others.

(B) Natural resources cannot be maintained properly without good farming practices.
We know only reverse is true:NO Culture->NOT(Good Farming).

(C) Good soil is a prerequisite of good farming.
Again. Opposite.

(D) Any society with good cultural values will have a good cuisine.
For Having a good meal- at least ALL in the chain must be true, but just their mere presence won't necessarily make good cuisine. There may be other requirements for a good cuisine that's not mentioned in the passage. Remember, we need Must be true, not May be true.

(E) When food is bad, it is because of poor soil and, ultimately, bad farming practices.
Could be; but not necessarily true. Food could be bad because of natural calamity, who knows. We just know that if the food is GOOD; at least everything in the chain is TRUE.

Ans: "A"

Awesome explanation. That Sheds some light on how to tackle CR questions.

120 seconds to tackle a CR question

Read Question Stem First. 10 sec
Read the stimulus once ( paragraph ) 30 sec
Perhaps write down in short precise words , make use of symbolic wordings as Fluke did in above example. 40 sec
Use POE on answer choices. 40 sec

+1 to you Fluke. I loved the way you made it lucid !
Intern
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 35
Re: LSAT CR: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2012, 21:41
fluke wrote:
GMATmission wrote:
Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce good food from bad soil, maintain good soil without good farming, or have good farming without a culture that places value on the proper maintenance of all its natural resources so that needed supplies are always available.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Rosen's statement?

NO Culture->NOT(Good Farming)->NOT(Good Soil)->(NOT)Good Food->(NOT)Good Meal

(A) The creation of good meals depends on both natural and cultural conditions.
Yes. It does. Good Meal comes at the end. It depends on everything prior to that. Let's rule out others.

(B) Natural resources cannot be maintained properly without good farming practices.
We know only reverse is true:NO Culture->NOT(Good Farming).

(C) Good soil is a prerequisite of good farming.
Again. Opposite.

(D) Any society with good cultural values will have a good cuisine.
For Having a good meal- at least ALL in the chain must be true, but just their mere presence won't necessarily make good cuisine. There may be other requirements for a good cuisine that's not mentioned in the passage. Remember, we need Must be true, not May be true.

(E) When food is bad, it is because of poor soil and, ultimately, bad farming practices.
Could be; but not necessarily true. Food could be bad because of natural calamity, who knows. We just know that if the food is GOOD; at least everything in the chain is TRUE.

Ans: "A"

I am still confused between A & E,

going by the logic if a leads to b, then if not b, then not a ......

now applying same logic to option E, it seems correct

if stimulus states Good Farming->Good Soil->Good Food, then if not good food ( bad food ) then not good soil ( bad soil) and bad farming practices

Pls clarify whr I am getting it wrong
Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 537
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Re: Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2016, 07:09
GMATmission wrote:
Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce good food from bad soil, maintain good soil without good farming, or have good farming without a culture that places value on the proper maintenance of all its natural resources so that needed supplies are always available.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Rosen's statement?

(A) The creation of good meals depends on both natural and cultural conditions.
(B) Natural resources cannot be maintained properly without good farming practices.
(C) Good soil is a prerequisite of good farming.
(D) Any society with good cultural values will have a good cuisine.
(E) When food is bad, it is because of poor soil and, ultimately, bad farming practices.

In my personal opinion, will rate it as a dubious question from a unknown source.
_________________
Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2467
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2016, 14:11
GMATmission wrote:
Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce good food from bad soil, maintain good soil without good farming, or have good farming without a culture that places value on the proper maintenance of all its natural resources so that needed supplies are always available.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Rosen's statement?

(A) The creation of good meals depends on both natural and cultural conditions.
(B) Natural resources cannot be maintained properly without good farming practices.
(C) Good soil is a prerequisite of good farming.
(D) Any society with good cultural values will have a good cuisine.
(E) When food is bad, it is because of poor soil and, ultimately, bad farming practices.

I chose A...the other ones are way too extreme...
CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 924
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Re: Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2019, 05:26
Bumping for further discussion
_________________
D-Day: November 18th, 2017

My CR Guide: Here
My RC Guide: Here
Want to be a moderator? We may want you to be one! See how: Here
Re: Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce   [#permalink] 27 Nov 2019, 05:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by