GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Sep 2019, 00:40

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
B
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 601
Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2013, 07:36
4
8
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (01:37) correct 41% (01:31) wrong based on 606 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

New project from GMAT Club! Click here


Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinion the used car John is considering is in good mechanical condition. However, it is clear that Sarah cannot be trusted to give an honest opinion, since when Emmett asked her opinion of his new haircut she lied and said she thought it looked good. Therefore, it is very likely that Sarah also lied in giving her opinion of the mechanical condition of that car.

The argument is flawed by virtue of having committed which one of the following errors of reasoning?

(A) It fails to offer any grounds for the attack it makes on the character of the person.
(B) It confuses claims about the past with claims about the future
(C) It bases a sweeping claim on the evidence provided by an instance that is not clearly relevant
(D) It presents evidence in value-laden terms that presuppose the conclusion for which that evidence is being offered.
(E) It wrongly assumes that because someone is a competent judge of one kind of thing, that person will be a competent judge of a very different kind of thing.

_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2012
Posts: 48
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
Re: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2013, 11:35
2
C it is !

Conclusion: Sarah cannot be trusted to give an honest opinion

Support1: Sarah said John's car is in good mechanical condition.
Support2: Lied about Emmet's haircut
Support3: May have also lied about the car . Therefore, the conclusion.

(A) It fails to offer any grounds for the attack it makes on the character of the person.
Incorrect. It DOES offer grounds for attack (lied about Emmet's haircut)

(B) It confuses claims about the past with claims about the future.
Incorrect. There's no support based on time frame.

(C) It bases a sweeping claim on the evidence provided by an instance that is not clearly relevant
Correct. The claim (that she's lying about the car since she lied about the haircut) is based on the irrelevant incident(haircut). No relation or linkage whatsoever between car condition and haircut likeability has been mentioned.

(D) It presents evidence in value-laden terms that presuppose the conclusion for which that evidence is being offered.
Incorrect. there is NO "pre-supposition" for the conclusion in the evidence given (support statements)

(E) It wrongly assumes that because someone is a competent judge of one kind of thing, that person will be a competent judge of a very different kind of thing.
Incorrect. No support about her being a competent judge of any thing.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 991
Location: United States
Re: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Nov 2013, 01:34
2
1
This question follows a classical style of CR: using "similar" but irrelevant reasoning.

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinion the used car John is considering is in good mechanical condition.
Fact: when Emmett asked her opinion of his new haircut Sarah lied and said she thought it looked good.
Sub-conclusion: it is clear that Sarah cannot be trusted to give an honest opinion
Main conclusion: it is very likely that Sarah also lied in giving her opinion of the mechanical condition of that car.

Question: The argument is flawed by virtue of having committed which one of the following errors of reasoning?

Pre-thinking: is "opinion of car" relevant to "opinion of hair" :?:

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

(A) It fails to offer any grounds for the attack it makes on the character of the person.
Wrong. Out of scope. The MAIN conclusion just says Sarah's opinion about the car is not true. The MAIN conclusion does not attack Sarah's character.

(B) It confuses claims about the past with claims about the future
Wrong. Out of scope. Nothing about past vs. future.

(C) It bases a sweeping claim on the evidence provided by an instance that is not clearly relevant
Correct. Clearly, the opinion about hair is NOT relevant to opinion about car. Hair and car are not in the same category. You can't use an apple to replace an orange. Evidences must be in the same category to make the comparison valid.

(D) It presents evidence in value-laden terms that presuppose the conclusion for which that evidence is being offered.
Wrong. Out of scope. The evidence used in the argument does not presuppose the conclusion. D talks about circular reasoning, but it's NOT the case here.

(E) It wrongly assumes that because someone is a competent judge of one kind of thing, that person will be a competent judge of a very different kind of thing.
Wrong. SHELL game. E is a reverse answer.
The logic of the argument is: A is NOT a competent judge of X ==> A is NOT a competent judge of Y either.
But the logic of E is: A is a competent judge of X ==> A is a competent judge of Y.
Clearly, E is a reverse version of the argument. Hence, E is wrong.

Hope it helps.
_________________
Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Posts: 60
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GPA: 3.33
WE: Consulting (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Dec 2014, 04:48
so many tricky traps in gmat questions
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 May 2014
Posts: 8
Re: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Feb 2015, 10:43
Yeah,guessed correct.In First case she was giving her professional opinion.In second case she was telling a white lie which we all tell.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5598
Re: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2016, 08:48
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio   [#permalink] 25 May 2016, 08:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Sarah, who is an excellent mechanic, said that in her opinio

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne