GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 14 Dec 2018, 11:49

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Typical Day of a UCLA MBA Student - Recording of Webinar with UCLA Adcom and Student

     December 14, 2018

     December 14, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Carolyn and Brett - nicely explained what is the typical day of a UCLA student. I am posting below recording of the webinar for those who could't attend this session.
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     December 15, 2018

     December 15, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

Scientific research that involves international collaborati

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 213
Scientific research that involves international collaborati  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2013, 21:24
2
6
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

79% (01:48) correct 21% (01:58) wrong based on 514 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Scientific research that involves international collaboration has produced papers of greater influence, as measured by the number of times a paper is cited in subsequent papers, than has research without any collaboration. Papers that result from international collaboration are cited an average of seven times, whereas papers with single authors are cited only three times on average. This difference shows that research projects conducted by international research teams are of greater importance than those conducted by single researchers.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Prolific writers can inflate the number of citations they receive by citing themselves in subsequent papers.

(B) It is possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is the product of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received

(C) The number of citations a paper receives is a measure of the importance of the research it reports.

(D) The collaborative efforts of scientists who are citizens of the same country do not produce papers that are as important as papers that are produced by international collaboration.

(E) International research teams tend to be more generously funded than are single researchers.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1017
Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: Scientific research that involves international collaborati  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2013, 23:29
2
1
Fact: Papers that result from international collaboration are cited an average of seven times,
Fact: Papers with single authors are cited only three times on average.
Conclusion: Research projects conducted by international research teams are of greater importance than those conducted by single researchers.

This question is about supporter assumption that will close the GAP between premises and conclusions.

The form is this question is:
X is cited more times than Y is cited.
==> X is more important than Y
We need a “bridge” to link the number of citations to the important of a paper. <== This is the assumption.

(A) Prolific writers can inflate the number of citations they receive by citing
themselves in subsequent papers.
Wrong. Irrelevant.

(B) It is possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is the product of international
collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received
Wrong. Irrelevant. We don’t discuss whether a paper is international. We only talk about whether a paper is important?

(C) The number of citations a paper receives is a measure of the importance of the
research it reports.
Correct. This is a supporter assumption that links the number of citations to the important of the paper.

(D) The collaborative efforts of scientists who are citizens of the same country do
not produce papers that are as important as papers that are produced by
international collaboration.
Wrong. Irrelevant. Nothing about citizens of same country vs. international.

(E) International research teams tend to be more generously funded than are single
researchers.
Wrong. Irrelevant. Nothing about funding.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 15 Nov 2016
Posts: 141
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
Re: Scientific research that involves international collaborati  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2017, 09:35
The author of the argument is making an assumption that more the number of citation, important a paper is.

Option C hinges on this assumption.

If we negate the option C we get "the number of citations a paper receives is not a measure of the importance of the research it reports" then on what basis the conclusion was drawn. Hence C is the answer.
Study Buddy Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1267
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Scientific research that involves international collaborati  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2018, 01:35
pikolo2510 nightblade354 GMATNinja KarishmaB gmatexam439

Can you advise if re-wording of (B) would be a valid assumption?
I think that is how I interpreted it in my head.

Quote:
Scientific research that involves international collaboration has produced papers of greater influence, as measured by the number of times a paper is cited in subsequent papers, than has research without any collaboration. Papers that result from international collaboration are cited an average of seven times, whereas papers with single authors are cited only three times on average. This difference shows that research projects conducted by international research teams are of greater importance than those conducted by single researchers.

Assumption Qs: always start with main conclusion:
Research projects conducted by international research teams are of greater importance than those conducted by single researchers.

I could also identify the scope shift from influence to importance

(B) It is possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is the product of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received

Reworded:
(B) It is possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is important in view of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received
Since negating it, does break my conclusion:
It is NOT possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is important in view of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received
_________________

It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8678
Location: Pune, India
Re: Scientific research that involves international collaborati  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2018, 05:12
1
adkikani wrote:
pikolo2510 nightblade354 GMATNinja KarishmaB gmatexam439

Can you advise if re-wording of (B) would be a valid assumption?
I think that is how I interpreted it in my head.

Quote:
Scientific research that involves international collaboration has produced papers of greater influence, as measured by the number of times a paper is cited in subsequent papers, than has research without any collaboration. Papers that result from international collaboration are cited an average of seven times, whereas papers with single authors are cited only three times on average. This difference shows that research projects conducted by international research teams are of greater importance than those conducted by single researchers.

Assumption Qs: always start with main conclusion:
Research projects conducted by international research teams are of greater importance than those conducted by single researchers.

I could also identify the scope shift from influence to importance

(B) It is possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is the product of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received

Reworded:
(B) It is possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is important in view of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received
Since negating it, does break my conclusion:
It is NOT possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is important in view of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received


No, option (B) is definitely incorrect. Read the argument again. Forget all about what is the assumption etc.
All the argument says is: Papers that result from international collaboration are cited an average of seven times, whereas papers with single authors are cited only three times on average.
Note that these are average numbers. International collaboration 7 times on avg and individual 3 times on avg.


Look at what option (B) says: It is possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is the product of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received
Say if a paper has received only 2 citations. Can we say that it must be an individual's work? No. The given figures are just averages. It is possible that an individual's paper get cited 10 times while an international collaboration paper gets cited only once.

The argument is linking citation with importance and that is what you need to focus on. Option (C) does just that.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 03 Mar 2017
Posts: 195
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Scientific research that involves international collaborati  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Sep 2018, 10:16
Scientific research that involves international collaboration has produced papers of greater influence, as measured by the number of times a paper is cited in subsequent papers, than has research without any collaboration. Papers that result from international collaboration are cited an average of seven times, whereas papers with single authors are cited only three times on average. This difference shows that research projects conducted by international research teams are of greater importance than those conducted by single researchers.

Conclusion :- The argument links citation to importance. The argument concludes that since papers that result from international collaboration are on an average cited more than papers with single authors, research projects conducted by international research teams are of greater importance than those conducted by single researchers.

We have to make an assumption based on above conclusion.
The author is assuming that citation is linked to importance. Based on this we move on to answer choices.


Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Prolific writers can inflate the number of citations they receive by citing themselves in subsequent papers.
Even if citation increases, we are not told about its link with importance. Wrong

(B) It is possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is the product of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received
Even if we are able to ascertain, we are not told about its link with importance. Wrong

(C) The number of citations a paper receives is a measure of the importance of the research it reports.
Correct. This is what we needed.

(D) The collaborative efforts of scientists who are citizens of the same country do not produce papers that are as important as papers that are produced by international collaboration.
Out of scope.Who produces and who does not is not important to us.

(E) International research teams tend to be more generously funded than are single researchers.
Funding is irrelevant. Wrong.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the Gods, All the Heavens, and All the Hells lie within you.

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Scientific research that involves international collaborati &nbs [#permalink] 17 Sep 2018, 10:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Scientific research that involves international collaborati

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.