Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Updated on: 20 May 2012, 23:07
Originally posted by alphastrike on 25 Mar 2012, 17:08.
Last edited by alphastrike on 20 May 2012, 23:07, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by alphastrike on 20 May 2012, 23:07, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
Thanks a ton to Bunuel, Karishma, and anyone else who helped me in quant! It is very much appreciated!
Glad to finally be done with math study and on to applications. I'm a little disappointed with my quant score, as I've done better in practice tests, but my overall score is median for HBS and stanford so hopefully they dont worry too much about my Q score being slightly below 80.
General test day stuff:
I bought a thin dry erase marker and dry erase sleeves to simulate the scratchpad. I used the setup for about 30 seconds before realizing that it just got in the way. I didnt use it in prep after that. The scratchpad didnt affect my test day performance at all. It maybe cost me a few seconds flipping it, but that's it. Dont worry about it.
I took the test during a "slow time" at the testing center. Even with nobody else taking breaks at the same time as me and no queue, it still took the administrators forever to get me for the break and check me in and out. I literally only had time to immediately go to the bathroom and come back. If there were other people to check in and out there is no way the breaks would have been under 8 mins. I advise finding out when the slow times are in advance and planning accordingly.
AWA:
I never practiced writing essay. I looked at a template for about 15 seconds before the test and that's it. Everything they ask you to write about is easy to poke holes in or take a firm position on. I wrote random crap. Nobody cares.
Quant:
Studied for a couple of months after work. Quant is my weak area. I'm good at math in that given time I can figure out pretty much anything, but unfortunately GMAT doesnt give you time. I took a bit too long on a few problems because my initial approach was bad. I also feel that I was extrememly unlucky with the questions I got. I am very strong in number theory and conceptual math, but got mainly computational stuff. Also, I've done tons of problems but there was one type I'd never seen before and 2 mins was too short to figure it out so I had to guess. I got THREE of this exact same type of problem. WTF is that? The form of the questions was 3 modulus with a bunch of roots and pi and variables in the middle that were stated to be in the form something squared + pi + variable ovoer a modulus that contained a !. Yeah...not good.
Used all of the MGMAT Prep material. I feel that it was a good foundation. I should have done the GMAT Prep tests earlier as the questions I saw were far different from the manhattan cat style. I only had a week to work with them which probably hurt my quant. Also, I found the PS by difficulty level and subject topic in the forums a week before my test. It would have helped immensely if I had found it earlier. The quant geniuses here know some formulas and shortcuts that manhattan doesnt teach you but are necessary for success. If you are like me and don't have the quant background, you need to know every trick possible to boost your efficiency.
Verbal:
Dont know what to say here. I did minimal study because I can just read the stuff and it makes sense. RC is the easiest if you can retain info well - I dont think their tricks are very tricky. Critical reasoning can throw a tough one out every once in awhile, usually when the correct answer could potentially be seen as out of scope. SC is probably what brought my score down. I personally feel that some of the correct answers are debatable. I know, for example, that there is a question in the OG that is flat out wrong. Some of the pedantic SC stuff is ambiguous (like whether "it" is sufficicent or you need to restate something for clarification). One of the questions I ran across on the actual GMAT was the worst I've ever seen. None of the setences were clear in meaning and all contained elementary grammar mistakes. Maybe it was experimental.
Prep tests and conclusion:
Prep tests are as follows. Breakdown for all Manhattan tests after the first was about 75-85% Q, 95-99% V. I used the first MGMAT CAT as a diagnostic when I first started the process. I took the 1st test again later because I forgot my login info and which email address I used so had to re-register. I spent like 3 hours on the quant section and got a 59%. Probably becuase I am a product of California public schools so never had to study much, and becuase College math wasnt that in-depth or difficult.
Again, GMAT prep quant is substantially different from Manhattan. Go through the banks early so you know what to expect. I wish I had. I strongly believe I could have hit 750+ had I done GMAT prep earlier and more effecitively used GMAT club quant resources.
MGMAT1A: 630
MGMAT1B: 700
MGMAT2: 720
MGMAT3: 730
GMATPREP1: 690 (blew math because of timing and got like a Q42)
Actual GMAT 730 (Q47 V44)
In conclusion, I'd like to offer encouragemnt to anybody out here who is struggling to shore up their weakneses. My quant score went from 59% it the beginning to 76% on test day (after what I believe was terrible luck in question distribution). If you are willing to put in 200 hours of study, you can make it happen. Given more time I'm sure I could have hit 90+ as things only really started to come together for me a week before the exam. My best advice is to enjoy the proces and take pride in your improvement, however small it may be. If you work hard enough and keep at it, you WILL get there.
Glad to finally be done with math study and on to applications. I'm a little disappointed with my quant score, as I've done better in practice tests, but my overall score is median for HBS and stanford so hopefully they dont worry too much about my Q score being slightly below 80.
General test day stuff:
I bought a thin dry erase marker and dry erase sleeves to simulate the scratchpad. I used the setup for about 30 seconds before realizing that it just got in the way. I didnt use it in prep after that. The scratchpad didnt affect my test day performance at all. It maybe cost me a few seconds flipping it, but that's it. Dont worry about it.
I took the test during a "slow time" at the testing center. Even with nobody else taking breaks at the same time as me and no queue, it still took the administrators forever to get me for the break and check me in and out. I literally only had time to immediately go to the bathroom and come back. If there were other people to check in and out there is no way the breaks would have been under 8 mins. I advise finding out when the slow times are in advance and planning accordingly.
AWA:
I never practiced writing essay. I looked at a template for about 15 seconds before the test and that's it. Everything they ask you to write about is easy to poke holes in or take a firm position on. I wrote random crap. Nobody cares.
Quant:
Studied for a couple of months after work. Quant is my weak area. I'm good at math in that given time I can figure out pretty much anything, but unfortunately GMAT doesnt give you time. I took a bit too long on a few problems because my initial approach was bad. I also feel that I was extrememly unlucky with the questions I got. I am very strong in number theory and conceptual math, but got mainly computational stuff. Also, I've done tons of problems but there was one type I'd never seen before and 2 mins was too short to figure it out so I had to guess. I got THREE of this exact same type of problem. WTF is that? The form of the questions was 3 modulus with a bunch of roots and pi and variables in the middle that were stated to be in the form something squared + pi + variable ovoer a modulus that contained a !. Yeah...not good.
Used all of the MGMAT Prep material. I feel that it was a good foundation. I should have done the GMAT Prep tests earlier as the questions I saw were far different from the manhattan cat style. I only had a week to work with them which probably hurt my quant. Also, I found the PS by difficulty level and subject topic in the forums a week before my test. It would have helped immensely if I had found it earlier. The quant geniuses here know some formulas and shortcuts that manhattan doesnt teach you but are necessary for success. If you are like me and don't have the quant background, you need to know every trick possible to boost your efficiency.
Verbal:
Dont know what to say here. I did minimal study because I can just read the stuff and it makes sense. RC is the easiest if you can retain info well - I dont think their tricks are very tricky. Critical reasoning can throw a tough one out every once in awhile, usually when the correct answer could potentially be seen as out of scope. SC is probably what brought my score down. I personally feel that some of the correct answers are debatable. I know, for example, that there is a question in the OG that is flat out wrong. Some of the pedantic SC stuff is ambiguous (like whether "it" is sufficicent or you need to restate something for clarification). One of the questions I ran across on the actual GMAT was the worst I've ever seen. None of the setences were clear in meaning and all contained elementary grammar mistakes. Maybe it was experimental.
Prep tests and conclusion:
Prep tests are as follows. Breakdown for all Manhattan tests after the first was about 75-85% Q, 95-99% V. I used the first MGMAT CAT as a diagnostic when I first started the process. I took the 1st test again later because I forgot my login info and which email address I used so had to re-register. I spent like 3 hours on the quant section and got a 59%. Probably becuase I am a product of California public schools so never had to study much, and becuase College math wasnt that in-depth or difficult.
Again, GMAT prep quant is substantially different from Manhattan. Go through the banks early so you know what to expect. I wish I had. I strongly believe I could have hit 750+ had I done GMAT prep earlier and more effecitively used GMAT club quant resources.
MGMAT1A: 630
MGMAT1B: 700
MGMAT2: 720
MGMAT3: 730
GMATPREP1: 690 (blew math because of timing and got like a Q42)
Actual GMAT 730 (Q47 V44)
In conclusion, I'd like to offer encouragemnt to anybody out here who is struggling to shore up their weakneses. My quant score went from 59% it the beginning to 76% on test day (after what I believe was terrible luck in question distribution). If you are willing to put in 200 hours of study, you can make it happen. Given more time I'm sure I could have hit 90+ as things only really started to come together for me a week before the exam. My best advice is to enjoy the proces and take pride in your improvement, however small it may be. If you work hard enough and keep at it, you WILL get there.
25 Mar 2012, 19:07
Kudos
Bookmarks
Congratulations! Very crisp and encouraging debrief. Your actual test score looks very different from GMAT prep, usually its almost same. Anyway, the more the better! 
26 Mar 2012, 01:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
Q47 V44 is a very nice balanced score! Congrats! I wonder if you should worry about your GMAT score at all! You have a 730 and you have a decent balance! Enough to kick ass!
