earnit wrote:
Thank you for your response Mike.
Kindly correct me as i try to put forth my interpretation of the same. The preposition "while" is also providing a contrast here?
Another thing, if gerund 'raising' is the subject here so is it imperative that it must also have a Verb to follow the S+V Agreement of clause?
Look forward to some assistance here.
Babar28 wrote:
Dear Mike,
thanks for your Valuable input. why is Option B incorrect ? Shouldn't the correct answer read .... "Have reduced ... and raised" ....
Regards,
BABAR
Dear earnit & Babar,
I'm happy to help.
First of all, the "
while" does provide contrast, and that contrast is logically necessary to the sentence. This is precisely why
(A) &
(B) are wrong. Choices
(A) &
(B) are examples of
False Parallelism. False Parallelism is the mistake of automatically putting every single verb in the sentence in parallel, regardless of their meaning. The GMAT
loves to trap folks with this mistake. Folks struggle with parallelism, and sometimes folks approach it mechanically, almost mathematically --- just match everything according to the same structure. The problem is that parallelism is not simply a grammatical structure --- it is just as much a logical structure, so we absolutely cannot afford to ignore the logical implications of putting all the words in parallel.
Think about this context. The "shift work equations" were based on getting workers enough sleep, so OK, had various health benefits, and the first verb, "
have reduced," lists in parallel three negative health impacts that were made better by implementing these measures. OK, so the measure benefit worker health. But then, the second part tells us that there is also a bottom-line implication: production efficiency increases. Wait a moment! That's something completely different! This measure not only impacts the biological well-being of the workers but it also has direct implication for the economic well-being of the company. That's very different! That deserves a contrast word, not simply another "
and." That's why
(B) is wrong.
And,
earnit, as to your second question: anything that follows a preposition is NOT a subject. Anything that follows a preposition is the
object of the preposition. This is precisely why we use the objective forms of personal pronouns (
me, him, her, us, them), not the subject forms (
I, he, she, we, they), after a preposition ---
without me, to him, after her, because of us, for them. Prepositions take objects, so here, "
raising" is an object.
Does all this make sense?
Mike