ajaygmat016
Shostakovich’s Fourth Symphony
had not hardly entered rehearsals when the political climate turned against the composer and made him having the piece performed impossible.
A. had not hardly entered rehearsals when the political climate turned against the composer and made him having
B. had not hardly entered rehearsals when the political climate turned against the composer and made his having
C. had hardly entered rehearsals when the political climate turned against the composer and made his havingD. had hardly entered rehearsals when the political climate turned against the composer and made him having
E. had hardly entered rehearsals when the political climate turned against the composer and made himself having
Please explain
Ok Going by the logic as mentioned in this forum:
Gerund and possessives (fused participle): Some people insist that when a gerund is preceded by a noun or pronoun, the noun or pronoun must be in the possessive case. Accordingly, it is correct to say I can understand his wanting to go, but incorrect to say I can understand him wanting to go.(C) is the correct choice. However if one needs to break this sentence into clauses for rather clear understanding of what role is played by which word, I am going to give it a try and would require some assistance.
"Shostakovich’s Fourth Symphony had hardly entered rehearsals when the political climate turned against the composer and made his having the piece performed impossible"Clause1:
Shostakovich’s Fourth Symphony had hardly entered rehearsals
Clause 2: when the political
climate turned against the composer and made his having the piece performed impossible
NOTE: Subject is in red color. Verb is underlined.
So the confusion lies in clause 2 if " his having " is a gerund/noun then it should act as a subject and 'performed' should be the verb, thereby making it a separate clause and so requires a comma to precede 'and' ????
Would be really thankful if someone could shed some light on it.