Only reason I picked A was because it was “better” than all the rest. I agree, I don’t like any of the answers for strengthening the argument.
But D is way more general than A. At least in A, we have the same exact musical arranger of the band she likes.
The passage goes out of its way to describe the type of music very specifically. Saying she likes all rock music —-> strengthens my belief that she will like this weird type of rock music MUCH less than if you told me the same producer/music arranger is part of both bands.
I also believed that the same musical arranger would be more likely to arrange lyrics with puns and other stuff she likes.
At least A provides a “bridge” to link the comparison of the 2 bands.
But imho, they all suck.
Edit: ouch, it’s an LSAT question too. I wonder if it was a discarded question.....
gvij2017 wrote:
A music arranger is someone who arranges a piece of music for a music director, music producer, conductor, a group of performers or a single performer.
Now, now option A is most disputable for me.
At first of half of the choice, J didn't care for CH. "But" indicates something opposite of earlier said statement.
But on arrival of CH, previous musical arranger has been replaced by MV music arranger.
Here no information is provided how MV music arranger is quite similar to CH music arranger.
According to conclusion statement-
Since Jackie is such a big fan of Moral Vacuum’s music, she will probably like The Cruel Herd’s new album.
I am not getting how option A is strengthening the argument. Please explain in detail!
Posted from my mobile device