It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 12:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1079

Kudos [?]: 681 [0], given: 0

Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2008, 06:36
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our highways, both money and human lives have been saved.
All of the following, if true, would strengthen the claim above EXCEPT:
(A) Most highway users find that travel times are not appreciably lengthened by the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit.
(B) Highway driving at 55 miles per hour or less is more fuel-efficient than high-speed driving.
(C) Nearly all highway safety experts agree that more accidents occur at speeds over 55 miles per hour than at lower speeds.
(D) The percentage of fatalities occurring in highway accidents at speeds greater than 55 miles per hour is higher than that for low-speed accidents.
(E) Automobiles last longer and require fewer repairs when driven at consistently lower speeds.

Kudos [?]: 681 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 May 2007
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: cr test d 2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2008, 15:42
Is it A?

Since, travel times have nothing to od with money and saving lives.

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 263

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 16

Re: cr test d 2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2008, 19:14
marcodonzelli wrote:
Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our highways, both money and human lives have been saved.
All of the following, if true, would strengthen the claim above EXCEPT:
(A) Most highway users find that travel times are not appreciably lengthened by the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit.
(B) Highway driving at 55 miles per hour or less is more fuel-efficient than high-speed driving.
(C) Nearly all highway safety experts agree that more accidents occur at speeds over 55 miles per hour than at lower speeds.
(D) The percentage of fatalities occurring in highway accidents at speeds greater than 55 miles per hour is higher than that for low-speed accidents.
(E) Automobiles last longer and require fewer repairs when driven at consistently lower speeds.


(A) does nothing to strengthen the claim. All others do
_________________

My GMAT debrief

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 16

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 575

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 0

Re: cr test d 2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2008, 19:42
simple one i guess..except A , all strengthens.

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2554

Kudos [?]: 518 [0], given: 0

Re: cr test d 2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2008, 21:00
marcodonzelli wrote:
Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our highways, both money and human lives have been saved.
All of the following, if true, would strengthen the claim above EXCEPT:
(A) Most highway users find that travel times are not appreciably lengthened by the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit.
(B) Highway driving at 55 miles per hour or less is more fuel-efficient than high-speed driving.
(C) Nearly all highway safety experts agree that more accidents occur at speeds over 55 miles per hour than at lower speeds.
(D) The percentage of fatalities occurring in highway accidents at speeds greater than 55 miles per hour is higher than that for low-speed accidents.
(E) Automobiles last longer and require fewer repairs when driven at consistently lower speeds.


I vote for none of the above. I think all of them strengthen. However, I chose A as well b/c it was the weakest.

B: saves money OUT
C: accidents, less chance of fatal accidents OUT
D: def OUT saves lives
E: saves money OUT

A: If times are not lengthened considerable then there is less of a chance of an accident so I think this can somewhat strengthen the argument, it is weak though when compared to the others. So its it. Anyway care to elaborate more on this?

Kudos [?]: 518 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1079

Kudos [?]: 681 [0], given: 0

Re: cr test d 2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2008, 21:48
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
marcodonzelli wrote:
Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our highways, both money and human lives have been saved.
All of the following, if true, would strengthen the claim above EXCEPT:
(A) Most highway users find that travel times are not appreciably lengthened by the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit.
(B) Highway driving at 55 miles per hour or less is more fuel-efficient than high-speed driving.
(C) Nearly all highway safety experts agree that more accidents occur at speeds over 55 miles per hour than at lower speeds.
(D) The percentage of fatalities occurring in highway accidents at speeds greater than 55 miles per hour is higher than that for low-speed accidents.
(E) Automobiles last longer and require fewer repairs when driven at consistently lower speeds.


I vote for none of the above. I think all of them strengthen. However, I chose A as well b/c it was the weakest.

B: saves money OUT
C: accidents, less chance of fatal accidents OUT
D: def OUT saves lives
E: saves money OUT

A: If times are not lengthened considerable then there is less of a chance of an accident so I think this can somewhat strengthen the argument, it is weak though when compared to the others. So its it. Anyway care to elaborate more on this?


OA A

Kudos [?]: 681 [0], given: 0

Re: cr test d 2   [#permalink] 30 Jan 2008, 21:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Since the 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was mandated on our

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.