mbacandidate2011 wrote:
I don't think the Sloan adcom is any more disorganized or unprofessional than other schools. The majority of Stanford applicants hear nothing from the adcom between the time they submit and the final decision date. Stanford sends out invites at random times to a very small subset of applicants, leaving the rest to wait anxiously until they're rejected on the final day. And I know a lot of deferred Columbia ED candidates who have been waiting since October for a decision from that adcom. Each school has their own process, some more stressful for applicants than others. That's just the way it is.
I'd tend to agree with you. MIT makes the choice to release their interview invites in batches. In my eyes, it's probably smarter on their end. Interview some people, get a sense for how they compete, wait to see who might withdraw apps for other Top 5 school acceptances. Then go out and interview some more. It may seem disorganized to us, but in reality, they're just using their time as they see fit. I don't think it's disorganized or unprofessional in any way. They've been as open as any other school has been about their process. I'm not sure why anyone is really justified in being frustrated at how the process has gone. They've done exactly what they've said they do.
While certainly schools like Duke that offer a specific interview invite date and release all decisions on the same date is simple and (mostly) beneficial to the students, I don't think that makes them any more organized or professional.