Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 11:10 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 11:10 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. 
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
GMATking94
Joined: 16 Jan 2022
Last visit: 18 Apr 2025
Posts: 175
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 125
Status:Do or Die
Location: India
Schools: IIMB '25 (A) IIMC '25 (A) IIMA '25 (D) ISB '25 (I)
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Operations (Energy)
Products:
Schools: IIMB '25 (A) IIMC '25 (A) IIMA '25 (D) ISB '25 (I)
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
Posts: 175
Kudos:
78
21 Dec 2022, 00:05
Kudos
Bookmarks
generis
Though all experts have given their views on this question, I would like to point out an easy way to tackle this question. As far I can see we can use parallelism trigger alone to get to the right answer choice. I know the meaning-based approach is best but I would rather prefer to use the known triggers first and finally if you are unable to select a correct answer choice then only move to the meaning-based approach.
The question -
Some business experts think that allowing employees to buy their employer's stock for a set price, no matter how high the stock rises, will give the employees a powerful incentive to work together, making a company more prosperous, which will thus increase the return to shareholders.
Which refers to " option to buy employer's stock or powerful incentive ".... Not clear.
Option B
Some business experts think that allowing employees to buy their employer's stock for a set price, no matter how high the stock rises, will give the employees a powerful incentive to work together to make a company more prosperous and will thus increase the return to shareholders.
No Parallelism and no redundancy of which.
Option C & D Parallelism Error
Option E "Which" Issue
12 Jan 2023, 21:09
Kudos
Bookmarks
generis
What is the sentence telling us?
That some experts think if employees are allowed to buy their employer’s stock for a set price (presumably lower than the current market price), the employees will get an incentive to work together to make the company prosperous (which will further increase its share price and hence their profit from the stock). This is turn will increase the profit to shareholders. So basically, if the employees have a stake in the company, they may get motivated to work hard to make the company successful and this in turn will increase the return to shareholders.
Let’s focus on the ‘that’ clause.
… allowing employees to buy their employer's stock … will give the employees a powerful incentive to work together, making a company more prosperous, which will thus increase the return to shareholders.
In short, the structure of the clause looks like this:
A will give employees B, which will thus increase C.
There are two intents here:
Incentive to do what? to work together …
Work together to do what? to make a company more prosperous
This will lead to an increase in the return to shareholders.
GMAT prefers infinitive to show intent. So first of all, (A) and (B) are preferable over others because of their use of ‘to work together.’
For the same reason, the use of ‘to make a company…’ is preferable.
The use of present participle with a comma at the end of the clause ‘making a company more prosperous’ often implies an effect of the verb before. It makes a little less sense here though only because we have a better option. Will just giving an incentive to work together make the company prosperous? May be not. In a company, whether employees get an incentive or not, they do need to work together. It might make more sense that they will work together toward the goal of making the company prosperous. Hence, in this regard, (B) and (D) are preferable.
(E) gives us two actions that the employees will have incentive for - ‘working together’ and ‘making a company more prosperous.’ As discussed above, it makes more sense to say that they will ‘work together to make the company prosperous.’
‘Which’ and ‘it’ usually refer to nouns, not clauses. Hence, we can now ignore (A), (D) and (E) since we have found other issues too in them.
In option (C), ‘they’ most likely refers to employees but do the employees increase return to shareholders? Debatable but let’s not eliminate based on this alone.
Note the structure of option (C):
A will give employees B, and thus they increase C.
When we are talking about what could happen in the future, we should give its impact in the future tense too.
A will give employees B, and thus they will increase C.
Now we know that we should eliminate option (C) too.
We are left with (B) which is preferable in each aspect discussed above.
Answer (B)
13 Jan 2023, 04:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
generis
Hey Everyone,
Here's a detailed solution to this interesting question. Make sure you give this question an honest attempt before reading further.
Some business experts think that allowing employees to buy their employer's stock for a set price, no matter how high the stock rises, will give the employees a powerful incentive to work together, making a company more prosperous, which will thus increase the return to shareholders.
Sentence Structure:
- Some business experts think that
- allowing employees to buy their employer's stock for a set price,
- no matter how high the stock rises,
- will give the employees a powerful incentive to work together,
- making a company more prosperous,
- which will thus increase the return to shareholders.
Aspects of Meaning:
- Some business experts believe that allowing employees to buy their employer's stock for a set (fixed) price, no matter how high the stock rises, has benefits.
- It will give the employees a powerful incentive to make a company more prosperous by working together.
- Note that owning company stock gives an employee an incentive to primarily make the company more prosperous. Of course, this can be done by working together, but the ultimate objective would be to make the company more prosperous. Else, why own stock? Right?
- It will thus also increase the return to shareholders.
- It will give the employees a powerful incentive to make a company more prosperous by working together.
Error Analysis:
- Choice A: Incorrect
- The deterministic error here is that the relative pronoun "which" has no clear antecedent. Logically, "which" should refer to "allowing employees to buy their employer's stock for a set price". However, its current position seems to indicate that it refers to "incentive" (the nearest noun). But, that's illogical since "incentive" does not "increase the return to shareholders".
- The second, more subtle error is the use of the verb-ing modifier "making a company more prosperous". In its current form, it is hard to tell whether "making" tells us the result/consequence of "to work together", the manner in which they work together, or the intent behind working together. Hence, "making" can at best be deemed an ambiguous modifier. We need a modifier that completes the logic behind employee ownership of company stock.
- The use of "and will thus increase" eliminates the deterministic error of "which" in choice A. Now, the subject of both verbs "will give" and "will increase" is "allowing employees to buy their employer's stock for a set price". This is logical and correct.
- Changing "making" to "to make" suggests that the employees get an incentive to work together to make a company more prosperous". This is logical and actually captures the intended meaning.
- "Incentive for working" is the incorrect idiom. "Incentive to work" is the correct idiom.
- "Making" is incorrect, as explained above.
- "and thus they" is incorrect. The use of "they" changes the subject of the second clause from "allowing employees...set price" to "employees". This cannot be allowed owing to the meaning of the word "thus"Quote:
- Answer choice C and the original sentence employ Meaning 2 described above. In this sense, we can see that the subject of the verbs in both clauses must be the same: "allowing...". This is because the second action is a consequence of the preceding action of the same subject. Hence, it is incorrect to use the pronoun "they".
- "Incentive for working" is the incorrect idiom. "Incentive to work" is the correct idiom.
- We do not need to use the pronoun "it" to repeat the subject "allowing...". Omitting "it" would make the sentence more crisp and rhetorical.
- "Incentive for working" is the incorrect idiom. "Incentive to work" is the correct idiom.
- Joining "working" and "making" with "and" suggests that these two actions are independent. However, the author wishes to say that the intent behind working together is to make a company more prosperous.
- "Which" has no logical antecedent.
Choice B: Correct
Choice C: Incorrect
Choice D: Incorrect
Choice E: Incorrect
Hence, the best answer is B.
Happy Learning!
Abhishek
25 Jan 2023, 11:33
Kudos
Bookmarks
EducationAisle
Hi EducationAisle - what is the difference between "comma and" and just "and" without the comma, which is used in this correct answer. Is there any parallelism in play here?
Reading B -
Some business experts think that allowing employees to buy their employer's stock for a set price
I am just confused with the structure of this correct answer. Do we have a Subject: Some business experts and then verb "think" and then a relative clause - "that allowing employees A (will ...) and B (will...)"
Can you please clarify? Thanks a lot!
