Bunuel
Some judges have allowed hospitals to disconnect life-support equipment of patients who have no prospects for recovery. But I say that is cold-blooded murder. Either we put a stop to this practice now, or we will soon have programs of euthanasia for the old and infirm as well as others who might be considered a burden. Rather than disconnecting life-support equipment, we should let nature take its course.
All of the following are valid objections to the above argument EXCEPT
(A) it is internally inconsistent
(B) it employs emotionally charged terms
(C) it presents a false dilemma
(D) it oversimplifies a complex moral situation
(E) it appeals to authority not universally accepted
My reasoning:
(A) it is internally inconsistent => True.
Rather than
disconnecting life-support equipment, we should
let nature take its course.disconnecting life-support can be considered letting nature take its course(B) it employs emotionally charged terms => True
But I say that is
cold-blooded murder. Emotional words(C) it presents a false dilemma => True
we will soon have programs of
euthanasia for the old and infirm as well as
others who might be considered a burden false dilemma. No actual reasoning seen in the passage supporting this.(D) it oversimplifies a complex moral situation => True
We cannot simply say disconnect life-support = immoral(E) it appeals to authority not universally accepted => Not true.
There is no mention of the intended audience of the passage => this is the correct answer