Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
10 May 2010, 11:03
Kudos
Bookmarks
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Hi all,
I find these two sentences on https://www.wired.com and I think these are incorrect:
1. If pain researchers would adopt this, we could get more accurate translations [of drug effectiveness] to humans.
As per Manhattan SC, in the IF clause, presence of Would/Could shows incorrect usage.
2. While Eckman didn’t do research on pain expressions, the mouse grimace scale beefs up his argument that facial expressions are not only ubiquitous across human cultures, but also all mammals.
In (2), I think the construction ...not only ubiquitous across human cultures, but also all mammals...is Incorrect.
Please comment.
I find these two sentences on https://www.wired.com and I think these are incorrect:
1. If pain researchers would adopt this, we could get more accurate translations [of drug effectiveness] to humans.
As per Manhattan SC, in the IF clause, presence of Would/Could shows incorrect usage.
2. While Eckman didn’t do research on pain expressions, the mouse grimace scale beefs up his argument that facial expressions are not only ubiquitous across human cultures, but also all mammals.
In (2), I think the construction ...not only ubiquitous across human cultures, but also all mammals...is Incorrect.
Please comment.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
14 May 2010, 21:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
Nice examples. Should the correction be:
1. If pain researchers adopt this, we will/can get more accurate translations [of drug effectiveness] to humans.
2. While Eckman didn’t do research on pain expressions, the mouse grimace scale beefs up his argument that facial expressions are ubiquitous across not only human cultures, but also all mammals.
1. If pain researchers adopt this, we will/can get more accurate translations [of drug effectiveness] to humans.
2. While Eckman didn’t do research on pain expressions, the mouse grimace scale beefs up his argument that facial expressions are ubiquitous across not only human cultures, but also all mammals.
