Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Originally posted by hardworker_indian on 02 Oct 2004, 21:15.
Last edited by hardworker_indian on 02 Oct 2004, 22:22, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Show timer
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
a0%
b0%
c0%
d0%
e0%
A
B
C
D
E
Hide
Show
History
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Some State Department officials hope to end the border skirmish by bargaining with the new dictator, others by proposing imposing stiff economic sanctions on the country's exports, and still others by demanding that NATO launch a full-scale invasion.
(A) by proposing imposing stiff economic sanctions on the country's exports, and still others by demanding
(B) by proposing the imposition of stiff economic sanctions on the country's exports, and still others demand
(C) propose imposing stiff economic sanctions on the country's exports, and still others are demanding
(D) are proposing the stiff imposition of economic sanctions on the country's exports, and still others are demanding
(E) propose the stiff imposition of economic sanctions on the country's exports, and still others demand
>
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I'd go with B. It was b/w A and B
A) "proposing imposing" double present participle
In general, the sentence structure is like this: Some X hope to end Y by Z, and still others demand ...
After the correction to the underlined part, I still stand by B. It is still b/w A and B and despite B's lack of parallelism at the end, there is a gross grammar error in A "proposing imposing"
Just wanted to bring this up for others to try. This was lost in myfrankenstein's 50-posts-a-day hurricanne attack.
This is a nice question that will teach a valuable lesson for parallelism.
If I may add some interest, many answers above are wrong
Indeed, it was quite a hurricane I feel concerned that my answer could be among the "wrong ones". I think E it is with parallelism as target780 rightly pointed out. It slipped my mind Now back to the basics...
Just wanted to bring this up for others to try. This was lost in myfrankenstein's 50-posts-a-day hurricanne attack. This is a nice question that will teach a valuable lesson for parallelism.
If I may add some interest, many answers above are wrong
Show more
Yep trying to make up for lost time. Forgive me if i did something wrong.
I have not purchased any books as yet and want to first clear of this whole site of all the info i can...and i figure it shall take a long long time unless i go into the hurricane mode.
Hi myfrankenstein, welcome aboard. We actually encourage active participation so there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. However, I would maybe suggest you have some rest now, you deserve it
Hi myfrankenstein, welcome aboard. We actually encourage active participation so there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. However, I would maybe suggest you have some rest now, you deserve it
Show more
Yep, welcome aboard, Frank. With enough hardwork, you'll get thorugh good.
If you won't take it as a criticism, I just have a friendly personal comment. "Do not post buffer comments like 'I agree - Same method as X', 'Good discussion', 'Yep, C' etc. Leave it be. Add comments and posts only when you disagree or have good alternative method or to help someone with their doubt."
I was afraid to give this comment thinking that it might sound picky. So, please do not think I am picky
That said, I will give a good advice - Go through archive, search for posts from Paul, JP, AkamaiBrah, Anandnk, etc. You will get good lessons.
OE - "The non-underlined portion establishes the form that the rest of the sentence must take: (1) the sentence is in the present tense (officials hope to end), and (2) by bargaining indicates that we're going to use "-ing" words. The key is recognizing that propose needs to agree with "hope", not bargaining. "E" is parallel & the three verbs--hope, propose, & demand--are all in the same form."
Think about the Subject and what it wants to do.. i.e action
Wrong:
X "Hope" to ... by "bargaining"....
Y by "proposing"...
and Z by "demanding" ...
Correct:
X "Hope" to ... by "bargaining"....
Y "propose"...
and Z "demand" ...
I was thinking too much into the question. I know E is more parallel..but I suspected some trick in it. if you remember, there is a similar question in OG, one of the toughest OG SC question , where something like " still others are calling" is considered parallel to propose and suggest..
Also, as i said before , " the imposition of stiff regulations" sounded more idiiomatic to me.
What's the source of this question?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.