Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 16:52 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 16:52

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92915
Own Kudos [?]: 619025 [6]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Jan 2017
Posts: 217
Own Kudos [?]: 265 [0]
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Retired Moderator
Joined: 30 Jan 2015
Posts: 636
Own Kudos [?]: 2427 [1]
Given Kudos: 1131
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1267
Own Kudos [?]: 5650 [0]
Given Kudos: 416
Send PM
Re: Spokesperson: The major school lunch vendors recently agreed to stop [#permalink]
+1 for B. Though B is a very good answer, I was looking for a better one. Clearly with negation of B, the conclusion will fall.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2019
Posts: 111
Own Kudos [?]: 48 [0]
Given Kudos: 516
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
Send PM
Re: Spokesperson: The major school lunch vendors recently agreed to stop [#permalink]
We need to find one assumption or a fact that , when negated, destroys the argument and tears it down completely :D
The argument presented is a typical correlation - causality problem. So if we show that : yes, there is no other disruption to this plan, the plan will work.
Option B is the right answer
:D
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Jan 2023
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 102
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
Send PM
Re: Spokesperson: The major school lunch vendors recently agreed to stop [#permalink]
Sir, please explain why not option A
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 88
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Send PM
Re: Spokesperson: The major school lunch vendors recently agreed to stop [#permalink]
1
Kudos
closetooa wrote:
Sir, please explain why not option A


A is too extreme:

A. ALL low-calorie beverages are BETTER for children than ANY high-calorie beverages.

This statement is too extreme because it assumes that no high-calorie beverage can ever be better than any low-calorie beverage. The spokesperson does not need to assume that for the argument to hold.

Also, the spokesperson's argument is focused specifically on the calorie content of the beverages and their impact on children's weight. The argument does not make a general claim that low-calorie beverages are always better than high-calorie beverages. The spokesperson does not need to assume this either for the argument to hold.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Spokesperson: The major school lunch vendors recently agreed to stop [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne