Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
30 Jun 2008, 10:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi,
I need some advice in deciding which school I should join for my part time MBA.
I got through Stern and Chicago GSB.
I want to specilize in Strategy Management and Leadership Management.
One of the most important deciding factors for me would be job opportunities since I will be making a complete switch
from a techinical developer to a strategy analyst.
Could you please tell me which one I should go for?
Thanks,
AB
I need some advice in deciding which school I should join for my part time MBA.
I got through Stern and Chicago GSB.
I want to specilize in Strategy Management and Leadership Management.
One of the most important deciding factors for me would be job opportunities since I will be making a complete switch
from a techinical developer to a strategy analyst.
Could you please tell me which one I should go for?
Thanks,
AB
30 Jun 2008, 17:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
I have some experience with stern's undergrad, and I very much think that chicago is a better bet (especially if you're looking for consulting, which stern is generally fairly poor in).
I saw a post on bw forums a couple of months ago that broke down the percentage of MBA (FT) graduates in consulting that got into mckinsey, bcg, or bain. Chicago placed around 50% in those three, whereas stern was significantly lower. FT is a little bit different though, and I know that stern's PT program is well respected. I've heard, though, that the prestige of the FT program is a more important factor than the PT program, so in that case I'd definitely go with chicago.
I saw a post on bw forums a couple of months ago that broke down the percentage of MBA (FT) graduates in consulting that got into mckinsey, bcg, or bain. Chicago placed around 50% in those three, whereas stern was significantly lower. FT is a little bit different though, and I know that stern's PT program is well respected. I've heard, though, that the prestige of the FT program is a more important factor than the PT program, so in that case I'd definitely go with chicago.
01 Jul 2008, 15:19
Kudos
Bookmarks
FT and PT degrees are very different. I would say the best way to decide is to choose which location you want to live for the 3 or 4 years it will take to finish. Also where your career can progress while you are still in school should be taken into account.
