Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 00:36 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 00:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
stringworm
Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Last visit: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Posts: 48
Kudos: 104
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
hoogly
Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Last visit: 31 Dec 2013
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
289
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Status:Head Turner ! am I ?
Affiliations: RHCE , CCNA, MCSE and Now GMAT ;)
Location: India
WE:Operations (Computer Hardware)
Posts: 121
Kudos: 289
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
stringworm
Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Last visit: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Posts: 48
Kudos: 104
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATPill
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Last visit: 17 Sep 2020
Posts: 2,260
Own Kudos:
3,852
 [2]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,260
Kudos: 3,852
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
stringworm
Thank you very much for responding, but I must respectfully disagree. I think it falls under the category of "Idiomatic expressions that designate quantities or parts." MGMAT SC guide p. 41 states "Idiomatic expressions that designate quantities or parts, such as a number of, the subject of the sentence is in an Of-prepositional phrase. These expressions provide the exception to the rule that the subject cannot be in a prepositional phrase."

Both of the following are correct:

One-third of the city is unemployed.
One-third of the people are unemployed.

And most importantly from a retired official test:

In an effort improve the quality of patient care, Dr. Lydia Temoscho is directing one of several clinical research projects that seek to determine the extent that psychological counseling helps to supplement the medical treatment of serious disease.
(A) seek to determine the extent that psychological counseling helps to supplement
(B) seek to determine how helpful psychological counseling is in supplementing
(C) seeks to determine how helpful psychological counseling is to supplement
(D) seeks to determine to what extent psychological counseling is a help in supplementing
(E) seeks to determine the extent that psychological counseling is helpful in supplementing

OA=B

Please let me know if you disagree.

That's right. You should be focusing on the keyword: WHO - which implies further description of the second half of the phrase TEACHERS.

"One of many teachers WHO WERE"

Teachers is plural so you use WERE.
"one of many teachers who were awesome"

On the other hand, if you didn't use the word WHO there, you could focus on the SINGULAR part by saying:

Only one of the 5 teachers was awesome.
or
Only 1 of the 5,000 people who applied was awarded a scholarship.

In the above example, "one of several projects that SEEK"

Here PROJECTS is further described - and since PROJECTS is plural, you use SEEK.

BUT--if you wanted to talk about that one particular project, you would say:

"Only one of the several projects submitted was actually chosen."

Hope that helps!
User avatar
hoogly
Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Last visit: 31 Dec 2013
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Status:Head Turner ! am I ?
Affiliations: RHCE , CCNA, MCSE and Now GMAT ;)
Location: India
WE:Operations (Computer Hardware)
Posts: 121
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatpill
stringworm
Thank you very much for responding, but I must respectfully disagree. I think it falls under the category of "Idiomatic expressions that designate quantities or parts." MGMAT SC guide p. 41 states "Idiomatic expressions that designate quantities or parts, such as a number of, the subject of the sentence is in an Of-prepositional phrase. These expressions provide the exception to the rule that the subject cannot be in a prepositional phrase."

Both of the following are correct:

One-third of the city is unemployed.
One-third of the people are unemployed.

And most importantly from a retired official test:

In an effort improve the quality of patient care, Dr. Lydia Temoscho is directing one of several clinical research projects that seek to determine the extent that psychological counseling helps to supplement the medical treatment of serious disease.
(A) seek to determine the extent that psychological counseling helps to supplement
(B) seek to determine how helpful psychological counseling is in supplementing
(C) seeks to determine how helpful psychological counseling is to supplement
(D) seeks to determine to what extent psychological counseling is a help in supplementing
(E) seeks to determine the extent that psychological counseling is helpful in supplementing

OA=B

Please let me know if you disagree.

That's right. You should be focusing on the keyword: WHO - which implies further description of the second half of the phrase TEACHERS.

"One of many teachers WHO WERE"

Teachers is plural so you use WERE.
"one of many teachers who were awesome"

On the other hand, if you didn't use the word WHO there, you could focus on the SINGULAR part by saying:

Only one of the 5 teachers was awesome.
or
Only 1 of the 5,000 people who applied was awarded a scholarship.

In the above example, "one of several projects that SEEK"

Here PROJECTS is further described - and since PROJECTS is plural, you use SEEK.

BUT--if you wanted to talk about that one particular project, you would say:

"Only one of the several projects submitted was actually chosen."

Hope that helps!


That was really a good explanation.Lucid and up to the point. thanks zeke.
User avatar
CRACKGMATNUT
Joined: 23 Jul 2020
Last visit: 26 May 2024
Posts: 147
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 147
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi. Thanks for this explanation and keeping me afloat while I was bogging down in this concept. Just for one last clarification if someone wants to help here. Picture this sentence:

1) Two of the 5 teachers who love/loves playing guitar was/were shortlisted for next round.

counter to this

1c) One of the 5 teachers who love/loves playing guitar was shortlisted for next round.

and one with prepositional phrase as subject:

1) Ringing bells is/are sign of catastrophy.

I'd be grateful If anyone can help me knock this concept out of park.
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,906
Own Kudos:
3,586
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,906
Kudos: 3,586
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mayank221133

1) Two of the 5 teachers who love/loves playing guitar was/were shortlisted for next round.

love/were

Quote:
1c) One of the 5 teachers who love/loves playing guitar was shortlisted for next round.
love

Quote:
1) Ringing bells is/are sign of catastrophy.
Both would work actually. To take care of ambiguity, we should articulate it as:

The ringing of bells is a sign of catastrophe.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses "one of the" mysteries, its application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.