Last visit was: 16 Aug 2026, 00:08 It is currently 16 Aug 2026, 00:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 16 Aug 2026
Posts: 112,717
Own Kudos:
834,586
 [5]
Given Kudos: 110,877
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 112,717
Kudos: 834,586
 [5]
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Reva22
Joined: 19 Sep 2024
Last visit: 14 Aug 2026
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Given Kudos: 47
Posts: 8
Kudos: 2
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhishekb1352
Joined: 16 Jan 2026
Last visit: 16 Aug 2026
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
25
 [2]
Given Kudos: 22
Products:
Posts: 37
Kudos: 25
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Vivek1707
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 15 Aug 2026
Posts: 323
Own Kudos:
143
 [1]
Given Kudos: 150
Products:
Posts: 323
Kudos: 143
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Whether the standard deviation is above $2,000 doesn't tell us whether most people earned more or less than Susan.
B. Correct If the mean ($38k) is $3,000 higher than the median ($35k), Susan's income of $36k is actually above the median. That means she earned more than at least half the people in her community, so her belief is clearly mistaken.
C. If the median is $37k, Susan's $36k is still below the median, so this doesn't challenge her belief much.
D. A few doctors earning very high incomes could raise the mean, but this alone doesn't tell us where Susan stands relative to everyone else.
E. Including part-time workers affects the average, but it doesn't tell us whether Susan earned less than the majority.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 16 Aug 2026
Posts: 112,717
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 110,877
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 112,717
Kudos: 834,586
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­Susan read in her local paper that the average (arithmetic mean) income in her community last year was $38,000. She worked very hard to make $36,000 last year and was upset that she earned less than the majority of the earners in her community.

Which of the following, if true, most calls into question Susan’s belief that she earned less than the majority of the earners in her community?

(A) The standard deviation of earnings in her community was greater than $2,000.

(B) The mean earnings in the community were $3,000 greater than the median earnings.

(C) The mean earnings in the community were $1,000 greater than the median earnings.

(D) Doctors in Susan's community had an average income over $200,000.

(E) The average income of $38,000 is calculated from the incomes of both full- and part-time workers.

­

KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



Step 1: The phrase “calls into question” signals that this is a Weaken question.

Step 2: Susan concludes that, since her income was less than the average in her community, her earnings were below the 50th percentile. She has conflated the meanings of median and mean in assuming earnings below the arithmetic mean put her in the bottom half of wage earners.

Step 3: The average income is computed by totaling all the earnings and dividing by the number of individuals counted. Susan's conclusion that she earned less than the majority of the earners in her community actually relates to the median earnings level rather than the mean. Thus, you could predict that a statement that provides information about the relationship between the median and mean earnings will be the correct answer.

Step 4: Choice (B) stipulates earnings $3,000 greater than the median level. Therefore, the median earnings would have been $38,000 – $3,000 = $35,000. Since Susan earned $36,000 her income would have been greater than the median amount. The median is the middle value for all the members of a set, in this case the set of wage earners in Susan’s community. Therefore, Susan actually earned more than half the earners in her community.

If choice (C) were applied, the median level would be $37,000 and Susan’s conclusion would actually be correct.

Standard deviation, in choice (A), refers to how widely dispersed the earnings levels are in the community, which has no bearing on Susan's reasoning.

While choice (D) might make you think that the mean earnings in Susan’s community must have been well above the median, this isn’t necessarily the case; it would depend on how many doctors there are relative to lower earners, and more generally on how earnings are distributed.

Finally, whether workers were part- or full-time, choice (E), has no bearing on the argument. Again, don't over-think the question by trying to figure out what the effect of part-time workers might be on the relationship between the mean and the median levels.­
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7398 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts