|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
19 Jun 2025, 06:58
Kudos
Bookmarks
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
66% (00:34) correct
33% (01:03) wrong based on 3 sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Technological advances in communication—such as computers and texting—have caused the teaching of cursive writing in school to become so exceptional that, if the trend continues, original source texts, minutes from historic meetings, diaries, and even letters from ancestors will become _________ to future generations.
A. unintelligible
B. intellectual
C. meaningless
D. humdrum
E. quotidian
F. indecipherable
A. unintelligible
B. intellectual
C. meaningless
D. humdrum
E. quotidian
F. indecipherable
22 Jun 2025, 13:32
Kudos
Bookmarks
OE
Fewer and fewer people are learning to write (or read) cursive, and it may become true that no one will learn it in the future. If that’s the case, no one will be able to read the documents written in cursive, rendering them unreadable. The two most closely matched answers are “unintelligible” and “indecipherable.” “Intellectual” does not fit the required meaning. “Meaningless” is a tempting answer, but the documents do have meaning—it’s just that no one will be able to determine what that meaning is. “Humdrum” and “quotidian” have similar meanings, but there’s no indication that the sources will be boring, so these answers are also incorrect.
Answer: A,F
Fewer and fewer people are learning to write (or read) cursive, and it may become true that no one will learn it in the future. If that’s the case, no one will be able to read the documents written in cursive, rendering them unreadable. The two most closely matched answers are “unintelligible” and “indecipherable.” “Intellectual” does not fit the required meaning. “Meaningless” is a tempting answer, but the documents do have meaning—it’s just that no one will be able to determine what that meaning is. “Humdrum” and “quotidian” have similar meanings, but there’s no indication that the sources will be boring, so these answers are also incorrect.
Answer: A,F
