1. The main argument advanced by the author of this passage isOn first reading, the passage seems to be talking about the diet and hunting habits of the Klasies people and more specifically, their preference to hunt eland rather than buffalo. (A) It was easier for the Klasies people to hunt eland than buffalo.
This is a possibility. The passage does spend large parts talking about how hunting eland was the preferred option and why. However, the passage also talks about other animals that were hunted such as Cape grysbok, seals etc. However, my discomfort is with the option stating that it was "easier to hunt eland than buffalo". While this is definitely stated in the passage, it doesn't appear to be the major argument being extended but only one of the details of a larger point being made. For instance, this point is completely missing from the first paragraph, which typically introduces the topic being discussed in the passage.
At this stage, we can hold on to this option.(B) The Klasies were unique among prehistoric people in that they consumed large land animals, such as buffalo, as well as smaller mammals from the sea.
Incorrect. Nowhere does the passage talk about the "uniqueness" of the Kalsies.(C) The Klasies people were at least partially responsible for the catastrophic extinction of the prehistoric antelope called the eland.
Incorrect. Nowhere does the passage talk about the "extinction" of eland.(D) Because the Klasies people lacked the use of projectile weapons and were therefore unable to hunt buffalo successfully, they diversified their diet to include smaller prey.
Incorrect. The passage clearly states that the Klasies were able to hunt buffalo, although they appear to prefer eland.(E) The prehistoric Klasies people had a diverse diet and advanced hunting skills and were probably not restricted to scavenging.
This appears to be the best answer option. The passage does talk about the diet and hunting skills. Additionally, all the details about hunting buffalo and eland can be considered to be an elaboration of the point being made about the hunting skills of the Klasies. Hence this option best summarises the larger message being put out by the passage.2. What signs indicate to the anthropologists that Klasies people were not restricted to scavenging?On this topic, the passage states (about the animal bones) - "The number and location of stone tool cutmarks and the rarity of carnivore tooth marks indicate that the people were not restricted to scavenging from lions or hyenas, and they often gained first access to the intact carcasses of even large mammals like buffalo and eland."(A) The number and location of stone tool cutmarks and the absence of carnivore teeth marks in the animal bones.
Correct. Consistent with above.(B) The fact that the animals consumed were not the victims of accidents or disease as would be expected from natural deaths.
Incorrect. Inconsistent with above.(C) The presence of a stone spear tip in the neck of a giant long-horned buffalo.
Incorrect. While this is mentioned in the passage, it is not as a reason for concluding that the Klasies were not merely scavengers.(D) The variety of different species whose bones were found in the Klasies camp, such as penguins, seals, and antelope.
Incorrect. While this is mentioned in the passage, it is not as a reason for concluding that the Klasies were not merely scavengers.(E) The lack of any evidence of a catastrophic event such as a flood, volcanic eruption, or epidemic disease.
Incorrect. While this is mentioned in the passage, it is not as a reason for concluding that the Klasies were not merely scavengers.3. According to the author’s theory, why did the Klasies people focus on eland instead of buffalo?On this topic, the passage states - "But the bones also show that the people tended to avoid confrontations with the more common—and more dangerous—buffalo to pursue a more docile but less common antelope, the eland. Both buffalo and eland are very large animals, but buffalo stand and resist potential predators, while eland panic and flee at signs of danger."(A) The eland were more numerous than the buffalo.
Incorrect. Inconsistent with above..(B) The eland would stand and fight while the buffalo would usually panic and flee.
Incorrect. Inconsistent with above.(C) The buffalo would stand and fight while the eland would usually panic and flee.
Correct. Consistent with above.(D) The eland were more easily obtained from other animals through scavenging.
Incorrect. The passage does not state this.(E) The eland were easily killed using the projectiles that the Klasies favored when hunting.
Incorrect. The passage does not state this.4. Which of the following game animals is NOT listed in the passage as a probable part of the Klasies diet?(A) penguins Incorrect.
The passage mentions penguins as part of the Klasies diet in line 6.(B) hyenas
Correct. Hyenas are not mentioned as a probable part of the Klasies diet.(C) seals
The passage mentions penguins as part of the Klasies diet in line 6.(D) giant long-horned buffalo
The passage mentions giant long-horned buffaloes as being hunted in the last but one line of the second paragraph.(E) small, greyhound-sized antelope
The passage mentions Cape grysbok as part of the Klasies diet in line 6.5. Which of the following evidence does the author present to support the assertion that the catastrophe the eland suffered was caused by human beings?On this topic, the passage states - "The numerous eland bones in the Klasies layers represent roughly the same proportion of prime-age adults that would occur in a living herd. This pattern suggests the animals were not victims of accidents or endemic diseases, which tend to selectively remove the very young and the old, but rather that they suffered a catastrophe that affected individuals of all ages equally. The deposits preserve no evidence of a great flood, volcanic eruption, or epidemic disease, and from an eland perspective, the catastrophe was probably the human ability to drive whole herds over nearby cliffs."(A) The presence of bones from prime-age animals found in the Klasies site.
Incorrect. It is not the mere presence of bones from prime-age animals, but their proportion which indicates human involvement.(B) The broken tip of a stone point embedded in the neck of an eland skeleton.
Incorrect. The broken tip of the stone point was found in the neck of a buffalo and not an eland.(C) The lack of any carnivore tooth marks on the eland bones at the Klasies site. Incorrect.
This is presented as evidence for humans not being only scavengers and not for the catastrophe suffered by the eland herd being caused by humans.(D) The number and location of tool marks found on the bones of a variety of animals at the Klasies site.
This is presented as evidence for humans consuming a wide variety of animals and not for the catastrophe suffered by the eland herd being caused by humans.(E) The lack of any signs of a flood, volcanic eruption, or epidemic disease.
Correct. Consistent with above.Hope this helps.
_________________
Updated on: 13 Oct 2020, 20:04
close
