Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 06:57 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 06:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
705-805 Level|   Weaken|            
User avatar
NischalP
Joined: 26 Nov 2019
Last visit: 20 Dec 2022
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V31
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V31
Posts: 61
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
akbgmatter
Joined: 10 Sep 2018
Last visit: 10 Dec 2020
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 16
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,203
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,203
Kudos: 272
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Poojita
Joined: 30 Dec 2019
Last visit: 02 Oct 2022
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 654
Location: India
Schools: LBS MFA "23
Products:
Schools: LBS MFA "23
Posts: 70
Kudos: 82
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
conclusion: CEO's in general are older now
we are not concerned how they are older now
there can be many reasons why ceo's are older now
1- companies are hiring old aged CEOs
2- CEOs have aged since they became CEO for the first time or during their tenure, they aged ( option B)
ETC
all these reasons tell us HOW the conclusion holds true
The conclusion doesnt break if we explain the reason behind. The conclusion simply states that CEOs ARE OLDER NOW THAN A FEW YEARS BACK
Option C is the correct answer since it tells us that the sampling that we've done is faulty. We've taken similar companies hence we cannot apply the generalization from such a grouping to all kinds of companies.
User avatar
DenisJames
Joined: 23 Sep 2019
Last visit: 16 Jul 2023
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 386
GMAT 1: 580 Q42 V27
GMAT 2: 610 Q46 V28
GMAT 2: 610 Q46 V28
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
imadkho
C strengthens the conclusion. The sample should be the same and should consist of companies which have been in business for at least 20 years; otherwise, how could any conclusion be drawn ?

I would pick A.

Please indicate the source.

Initially, I also picked A. However, the question did not ask to justify the reasons for the conclusion made here. It asked for a weakener (i.e., the conclusion is not true/in general, they may not be older now). Option C makes it clear to us that the sample is only for the companies operating for at least 20 years. Younger companies may have younger CEOs, but the sample did not consider it!!! I hope it is clear for both of us now. I am also learning.
User avatar
nikkimah
Joined: 20 Jul 2023
Last visit: 08 Jan 2025
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 22
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The average age of chief executive officers (CEO’s) in a large sample of companies is 57. The average age of CEO’s in those same companies 20 years ago was approximately eight years younger. On the basis of those data, it can be concluded that CEO’s in general tend to be older now.

Which of the following casts the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?
(A) The dates when the CEO’s assumed their current positions have not been specified.
(B) No information is given concerning the average number of years that CEOs remain in office.
If For Example, the CEO has been in offc for 10 years and the data was collected when he was completing his 10th year - joined as CEO at age 35 and data represents 45 for the large sample. Whereas the 20 years ago, the CEO served for 1 year and data represents 35 years. In this case, it would show that 20 years ago, the CEOs were younger. Hence, dont we need to know that how many yrs the CEOs served the office and the data point was taken in which year?
I find the option choice A also in similar lines and hence it is confusing to choose between B option choice and C which is the correct one.

GMATNinja marty karishma

Thanks
User avatar
Aneet
Joined: 22 Jun 2023
Last visit: 27 Apr 2025
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 104
Location: India
Posts: 10
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
siddharthasingh
Why can't the answer be a? Suppose a CEO was assigned to current designation several years ago, then one cannot say that he took this position when he was old.
IMO both a and c are top contenders.
Please correct me if I am wrong

Even if there are many such cases (the CEO has been the same for the last 20 yrs), it still doesn't weaken our conclusion. Our conclusion is that CEO’s in general tend to be older now. It doesn't matter why the CEOs are older now. The conclusion says that they are older and that's true even if the CEOs have grown old while on the CEO chair.

On the other hand, option (C) says that the conclusion is being drawn on a sample of a particular type of companies. This means you cannot generalize whatever you observe in the sample. Hence it weakens our conclusion that CEO’s in general tend to be older now.
Wat if the number of companies are1% of all the companies. Then C doesn't weaken. Since the statement mentions "in general".
User avatar
AditiDeokar
Joined: 12 Jan 2025
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 20
Given Kudos: 273
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Posts: 20
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi KarishmaB why do we eliminate answer choice B
KarishmaB


Even if there are many such cases (the CEO has been the same for the last 20 yrs), it still doesn't weaken our conclusion. Our conclusion is that CEO’s in general tend to be older now. It doesn't matter why the CEOs are older now. The conclusion says that they are older and that's true even if the CEOs have grown old while on the CEO chair.

On the other hand, option (C) says that the conclusion is being drawn on a sample of a particular type of companies. This means you cannot generalize whatever you observe in the sample. Hence it weakens our conclusion that CEO’s in general tend to be older now.
User avatar
glagad
Joined: 03 Jun 2022
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 149
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 107
Products:
Posts: 149
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
So, my reasoning for selecting B was that a CEO who has served in the office for a longer period of time, will age and contribute to an increase in the higher average age of CEOs, a strong weakener for the conclusion drawn in the argument.


Can you tell me your thoughts about the same?
KarishmaB


Premises:

The average age of CEOs in a large sample of companies is 57.
The average age of CEO’s in those same companies 20 years ago was approximately eight years younger.

Conclusion: CEO’s in general tend to be older now.

(B) No information is given concerning the average number of years that CEO’s remain in office.

This is irrelevant. Does it matter whether the CEO's remain in office for 10 years or for 2 years? Point is, it doesn't matter whether the 20 companies have the same CEOs that they had 8 yrs ago or they change CEO's every year and have been hiring older CEOs. In any case, in those 20 companies CEOs are older today than they were 8 yrs ago. So option (B) does not weaken the conclusion.
User avatar
miag
Joined: 10 Dec 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 189
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 143
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Sustainability
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q87 V83 DI80
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q87 V83 DI80
Posts: 189
Kudos: 73
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

Actually I would highlight a couple of areas for you to reassess your reasoning:
i) Does a CEO having served in office for a longer period of time necessarily mean that they are older? or will contribute to an increase in a higher average age of CEOs? Consider a case where someone joined the company at a younger age due to being highly competent and progressed up - they could be still at a young age when they reach CEO level.
>> Their tenure doesn’t tell us anything about the ages of the CEOs who were in those positions two decades earlier.

ii) Hence, even if we had this information, we would not be able to clearly determine whether this information weakens or strengthens the conclusion.

Hope this helps! :)
glagad
So, my reasoning for selecting B was that a CEO who has served in the office for a longer period of time, will age and contribute to an increase in the higher average age of CEOs, a strong weakener for the conclusion drawn in the argument.


Can you tell me your thoughts about the same?

   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts