The average age of chief executive officers (CEO’s) in a large sample of companies is 57. The average age of CEO’s in those same companies 20 years ago was approximately eight years younger. On the basis of those data, it can be concluded that CEO’s in general tend to be older now.
Which of the following casts the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?
(A) The dates when the CEO’s assumed their current positions have not been specified.
(B) No information is given concerning the average number of years that CEOs remain in office.
If For Example, the CEO has been in offc for 10 years and the data was collected when he was completing his 10th year - joined as CEO at age 35 and data represents 45 for the large sample. Whereas the 20 years ago, the CEO served for 1 year and data represents 35 years. In this case, it would show that 20 years ago, the CEOs were younger. Hence, dont we need to know that how many yrs the CEOs served the office and the data point was taken in which year?
I find the option choice A also in similar lines and hence it is confusing to choose between B option choice and C which is the correct one.
GMATNinja marty karishma Thanks