The case of the French Revolution is typically regarded as the best evidence for the claim that societies can reap more benefit than harm from a revolution. But even the French Revolution serves this role poorly, since France at the time of the Revolution had a unique advantage. Despite the Revolution, the same civil servants and functionaries remained in office, carrying on the day-to-day work of government, and thus many of the disruptions that revolutions normally bring were avoided.
Which one of the following most accurately characterizes the argumentative strategy used in the passage?
Pre-thinking
The author opposes a claim made in the first sentence by undermining the idea that the French revolution is the best evidence for that claim
POE
(A) demonstrating that the claim argued against is internally inconsistent
Tricky but a good understanding of the claim at hand will make us reject promptly this choice. Claim:societies can reap more benefit than harm from a revolution.
What the author shows is that the french revolution is not a good evidence but she does not point out inconsistencies in the mentioned claim
(B) supporting a particular position on the basis of general principles
Irrelevant
(C) opposing a claim by undermining evidence offered in support of that claim
In line with pre-thinking
(D) justifying a view through the use of a series of persuasive examples
Irrelevant
(E) comparing two positions in order to illustrate their relative strengths and weaknesses
Irrelevant