Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jul 1011:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
In our conversation, Kishore talks about how strategically he used data analytics to identify high impact areas to focus on as well as his early morning study routine (3 AM prep!) that optimized his GMAT preparation.- Jun 30
08:00 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
Join us June 30th for 2 weeks of GMAT questions (just 8 per day) to help with your prep and to compete with your fellow GMAT Clubbers for a chance to win a prize fund of $30,000 for you and your team-mates! 
Jul 0901:00 PM EDT
-02:00 PM EDT
More Target Test Prep students are earning 100th percentile GMAT scores. Don’t settle for less when the Target Test Prep course gives you everything you need to score high on the GMAT. Start your 5-day free trial today.
Jul 1206:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join our webinar to master GMAT RC Main Point Questions! Learn effective strategies to decipher passage themes and purposes. Senior Verbal Expert- Sunita Singhvi will equip you with tools to navigate complexities and avoid common traps set by the GMAT.
Jul 1211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this session to learn how to Deconstruct arguments, Pre-Think Author’s Assumptions, and apply Negation Test.
Jul 1311:00 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EDT
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.
Jul 1508:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Jul 1611:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
13 Jan 2025, 01:21
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
36% (01:44) correct
64%
(02:02)
wrong
based on 132
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The city of Greenfield has been experiencing a significant increase in residential burglaries over the past two years. Despite enhancing police patrols in residential areas, the number of burglaries has continued to rise. In contrast, the neighboring city of Lakeside implemented a neighborhood watch program combined with improved street lighting, resulting in a 40% reduction in residential burglaries within one year. To curb the rising burglary rates, Greenfield’s city council proposes adopting a similar neighborhood watch program and upgrading street lighting across residential neighborhoods.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the city council’s plan to adopt a neighborhood watch program and upgrade street lighting in Greenfield?
A. Greenfield has a higher population density than Lakeside, making neighborhood watch programs easier to organize.
B. Surveys indicate that a majority of Greenfield residents feel unsafe at night due to poor street lighting.
C. The cost of implementing the neighborhood watch program and upgrading street lighting in Greenfield is estimated to exceed the current budget by 20%.
D. Lakeside’s reduction in burglaries occurred during the same period when they also increased the number of police officers on patrol.
E. Some residents in Greenfield have previously participated in volunteer programs aimed at community safety.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the city council’s plan to adopt a neighborhood watch program and upgrade street lighting in Greenfield?
A. Greenfield has a higher population density than Lakeside, making neighborhood watch programs easier to organize.
B. Surveys indicate that a majority of Greenfield residents feel unsafe at night due to poor street lighting.
C. The cost of implementing the neighborhood watch program and upgrading street lighting in Greenfield is estimated to exceed the current budget by 20%.
D. Lakeside’s reduction in burglaries occurred during the same period when they also increased the number of police officers on patrol.
E. Some residents in Greenfield have previously participated in volunteer programs aimed at community safety.
13 Jan 2025, 01:22
Kudos
Bookmarks
Answer:
B. Surveys indicate that a majority of Greenfield residents feel unsafe at night due to poor street lighting.
Explanation:
Option B strengthens the city council’s plan by highlighting that poor street lighting is a significant concern among residents, implying that upgrading street lighting would directly address a key factor contributing to the perceived and possibly actual increase in burglaries. This aligns with Lakeside’s successful strategy, making the proposed plan more likely to be effective in Greenfield.
Breakdown of the Question Creation:
1. Develop a Clear Argument:
• Premise 1: Greenfield’s current method (enhanced police patrols) hasn’t reduced burglaries.
• Premise 2: Lakeside successfully reduced burglaries by implementing a neighborhood watch program and improving street lighting.
• Conclusion: Greenfield should adopt a similar neighborhood watch program and upgrade street lighting to reduce burglaries.
2. Determine What to Strengthen:
• The effectiveness of the proposed solution in the context of Greenfield’s specific circumstances.
3. Create Answer Choices:
• One Correct Choice (B): Directly supports the effectiveness of the proposed solution by linking residents’ concerns to the plan.
• Other Choices:
• A: Introduces a comparative factor but doesn’t directly strengthen the argument.
• C: Presents a potential drawback, weakening the argument.
• D: Suggests an alternative reason for Lakeside’s success, which might weaken the direct applicability of the solution.
• E: Provides additional information but doesn’t directly strengthen the proposed plan.
4. Ensure Logical Consistency:
• The correct answer should clearly support the effectiveness and relevance of the proposed solution in addressing the specific issues faced by Greenfield.
B. Surveys indicate that a majority of Greenfield residents feel unsafe at night due to poor street lighting.
Explanation:
Option B strengthens the city council’s plan by highlighting that poor street lighting is a significant concern among residents, implying that upgrading street lighting would directly address a key factor contributing to the perceived and possibly actual increase in burglaries. This aligns with Lakeside’s successful strategy, making the proposed plan more likely to be effective in Greenfield.
Breakdown of the Question Creation:
1. Develop a Clear Argument:
• Premise 1: Greenfield’s current method (enhanced police patrols) hasn’t reduced burglaries.
• Premise 2: Lakeside successfully reduced burglaries by implementing a neighborhood watch program and improving street lighting.
• Conclusion: Greenfield should adopt a similar neighborhood watch program and upgrade street lighting to reduce burglaries.
2. Determine What to Strengthen:
• The effectiveness of the proposed solution in the context of Greenfield’s specific circumstances.
3. Create Answer Choices:
• One Correct Choice (B): Directly supports the effectiveness of the proposed solution by linking residents’ concerns to the plan.
• Other Choices:
• A: Introduces a comparative factor but doesn’t directly strengthen the argument.
• C: Presents a potential drawback, weakening the argument.
• D: Suggests an alternative reason for Lakeside’s success, which might weaken the direct applicability of the solution.
• E: Provides additional information but doesn’t directly strengthen the proposed plan.
4. Ensure Logical Consistency:
• The correct answer should clearly support the effectiveness and relevance of the proposed solution in addressing the specific issues faced by Greenfield.
17 Jan 2025, 11:22
Kudos
Bookmarks
chandy123
Answer:
B. Surveys indicate that a majority of Greenfield residents feel unsafe at night due to poor street lighting.
Explanation:
Option B strengthens the city council’s plan by highlighting that poor street lighting is a significant concern among residents, implying that upgrading street lighting would directly address a key factor contributing to the perceived and possibly actual increase in burglaries. This aligns with Lakeside’s successful strategy, making the proposed plan more likely to be effective in Greenfield.
Breakdown of the Question Creation:
1. Develop a Clear Argument:
• Premise 1: Greenfield’s current method (enhanced police patrols) hasn’t reduced burglaries.
• Premise 2: Lakeside successfully reduced burglaries by implementing a neighborhood watch program and improving street lighting.
• Conclusion: Greenfield should adopt a similar neighborhood watch program and upgrade street lighting to reduce burglaries.
2. Determine What to Strengthen:
• The effectiveness of the proposed solution in the context of Greenfield’s specific circumstances.
3. Create Answer Choices:
• One Correct Choice (B): Directly supports the effectiveness of the proposed solution by linking residents’ concerns to the plan.
• Other Choices:
• A: Introduces a comparative factor but doesn’t directly strengthen the argument.
• C: Presents a potential drawback, weakening the argument.
• D: Suggests an alternative reason for Lakeside’s success, which might weaken the direct applicability of the solution.
• E: Provides additional information but doesn’t directly strengthen the proposed plan.
4. Ensure Logical Consistency:
• The correct answer should clearly support the effectiveness and relevance of the proposed solution in addressing the specific issues faced by Greenfield.
If we assume that the city people have prior volunteering experience which supports the implementation of the neighborhood watch program, hence, option E could also act as a strengthener for the argument. Is the preceding reasoning correct? B. Surveys indicate that a majority of Greenfield residents feel unsafe at night due to poor street lighting.
Explanation:
Option B strengthens the city council’s plan by highlighting that poor street lighting is a significant concern among residents, implying that upgrading street lighting would directly address a key factor contributing to the perceived and possibly actual increase in burglaries. This aligns with Lakeside’s successful strategy, making the proposed plan more likely to be effective in Greenfield.
Breakdown of the Question Creation:
1. Develop a Clear Argument:
• Premise 1: Greenfield’s current method (enhanced police patrols) hasn’t reduced burglaries.
• Premise 2: Lakeside successfully reduced burglaries by implementing a neighborhood watch program and improving street lighting.
• Conclusion: Greenfield should adopt a similar neighborhood watch program and upgrade street lighting to reduce burglaries.
2. Determine What to Strengthen:
• The effectiveness of the proposed solution in the context of Greenfield’s specific circumstances.
3. Create Answer Choices:
• One Correct Choice (B): Directly supports the effectiveness of the proposed solution by linking residents’ concerns to the plan.
• Other Choices:
• A: Introduces a comparative factor but doesn’t directly strengthen the argument.
• C: Presents a potential drawback, weakening the argument.
• D: Suggests an alternative reason for Lakeside’s success, which might weaken the direct applicability of the solution.
• E: Provides additional information but doesn’t directly strengthen the proposed plan.
4. Ensure Logical Consistency:
• The correct answer should clearly support the effectiveness and relevance of the proposed solution in addressing the specific issues faced by Greenfield.
