Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 25 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Scoring 329 on the GRE is not always about using more books, more courses, or a longer study plan. In this episode of GRE Success Talks, Ashutosh shares his GRE preparation strategy, study plan, and test-day experience, explaining how he kept his prep....
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
67%
(02:04)
correct 33%
(02:11)
wrong
based on 9
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The coal mines at Newcastle were so rich that all the coal mined there glutted the Scottish market, sending nationwide coal prices downward. To bolster coal prices, the Scottish Parliament offered mine owners who took 15% of the mineshafts out of production a direct subsidy payment, up to a certain maximum cap per mine. Scotland’s subsidy program, if successful, will not be a net burden on the budget.
Which of the following, if true, is the best explanation of the author's conclusion?
A ) The nation lost tax revenues when lowered coal prices caused financial losses for mine owners. B) The year that Scotland adopted this subsidy program, coal mining output in other parts of the U.K. fell 5%. C) Available mineshafts’ area was 10% below its average level during the first year that Scotland adopted this subsidy program. D) The maximum subsidy per mine caused subsidy payments per idle acre to be less for large mines than for smaller ones. E) If mine owners took the subsidy, they found they could not put the idle mine land to any use.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The coal mines at Newcastle were so rich that all the coal mined there glutted the Scottish market, sending nationwide coal prices downward. To bolster coal prices, the Scottish Parliament offered mine owners who took 15% of the mineshafts out of production a direct subsidy payment, up to a certain maximum cap per mine. Scotland’s subsidy program, if successful, will not be a net burden on the budget.
Which of the following, if true, is the best explanation of the author's conclusion?
A ) The nation lost tax revenues when lowered coal prices caused financial losses for mine owners. B) The year that Scotland adopted this subsidy program, coal mining output in other parts of the U.K. fell 5%.Irrelevant C) Available mineshafts’ area was 10% below its average level during the first year that Scotland adopted this subsidy program.out of scope D) The maximum subsidy per mine caused subsidy payments per idle acre to be less for large mines than for smaller ones.out of scope E) If mine owners took the subsidy, they found they could not put the idle mine land to any use.Opposite answer.
Show more
A is the best reason. If the nation lost the revenues from the tax, then giving some subsidy would overwhelm the loss.
It's an conditional argument and comprise of Sufficient condition (successful subsidy program) and the necessary condition (will not be a net burden on the budget). In order to support such argument you got to show that the necessary condition is infact necessary for sufficient condition to occur.
Diagrammatically,
successful subsidy program-/->burden on the budget
Only statement A best explains it saying that nation will suffer loses in tax revenues when coal prices is lowered.
The only satisfactory reason to explain how the govt providing subsidy will not be a pressure on budget has to bring in an nsight which says that the government will me making up for this monetary outflow in some way. Answer A directly talks of tax revenues, and implies that what governemnt loses subsidy will be gained in tax revenues- hence no pressure on budget no other explanation even talks of govt getting any money, or the pressure being offset in some othwer way.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.