Last visit was: 19 Jul 2025, 23:46 It is currently 19 Jul 2025, 23:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,627
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,235
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,627
Kudos: 742,834
 [15]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sumit99kr
Joined: 12 Aug 2022
Last visit: 30 Sep 2024
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
148
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.57
Products:
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 145
Kudos: 148
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Can,Will
Joined: 17 May 2018
Last visit: 05 Apr 2025
Posts: 185
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 138
Location: India
Schools: IIM
Products:
Schools: IIM
Posts: 185
Kudos: 37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dwdaakash
Joined: 15 Oct 2022
Last visit: 13 Nov 2023
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B here is the correct answer

Explanation: Through the negation technique. Negating B reverses the causal relationship that serves as the conclusion of the passage

Conclusion: Economic slowdown causes increase in crime rate, ie: economic slowdown is a cause of increase in crime rate
Assumption: Increasing crime rate is not a cause of economic slowdown The inverse of which is that an increasing crime rate is a cause of economic slowdown
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,627
Own Kudos:
742,834
 [1]
Given Kudos: 98,235
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,627
Kudos: 742,834
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The cultures of two closely located cities have generally been found to be identical. When one of such twin cities sees an economic slowdown, the event overlaps with increased crime rate in it as compared to the other city. When the economic health is similar in both cities, the two cities exhibit similar crime rates. Therefore, this finding provides definitive evidence that crime rate is a direct result of slowing economy.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

(A) Reliable studies have found that lack of financial well-being increases the likelihood of criminal behavior in individuals.
(B) Increasing crime rate is not a cause of slowing economy.
(C) Economy of a city with twin city is generally no slower than another city with no twin.
(D) In a pair of twin cities both suffering from high crime rate, the economies are equally slow.
(E) Twin cities are no less likely to suffer from high crime rate than other cities with no twin.


This is a CR Butler Question



Experts' Global Video Explanation:

User avatar
Tea12
Joined: 09 Aug 2018
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Products:
Posts: 19
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

(A) Reliable studies have found that lack of financial well-being increases the likelihood of criminal behavior in individuals.
Can someone give a clear and relevant explanation for why is choice A incorrect ?
User avatar
HarshZsssh
Joined: 20 Aug 2024
Last visit: 12 Apr 2025
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
9
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 42
Kudos: 9
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
need bit explanation for option d why its incorrect
User avatar
vibhor1902
Joined: 22 Jan 2025
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 34
Products:
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hey I had an issues negating option B can someone please help me with the right approach here..
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 19 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,004
Own Kudos:
652
 [1]
Given Kudos: 194
Products:
Posts: 1,004
Kudos: 652
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: This finding provides definitive evidence that crime rate is a direct result of slowing economy.
Author is assuming causation here. Slow economy leads to increased crime rate

(A) Reliable studies have found that lack of financial well-being increases the likelihood of criminal behavior in individuals.
Restates the conclusion, supported by reliable studies. The author believes in this based on his findings and doesn't need reliable studies to be true to hold the conclusion

(B) Increasing crime rate is not a cause of slowing economy.
This makes sense. Author needs to believe it is not the other way round, i.e. Increased crime rate --> slow economy

(C) Economy of a city with twin city is generally no slower than another city with no twin.
We are concerned about crime rate wrt to economy and don't care how economy compares to another city with no twin

(D) In a pair of twin cities both suffering from high crime rate, the economies are equally slow.
This just establishes the correlation that high crime and slow economy co-exist. It doesn't justify the causation

(E) Twin cities are no less likely to suffer from high crime rate than other cities with no twin.
We are concerned about crime rate wrt to economy and don't care how crime rates compares to another city with no twin
Bunuel
The cultures of two closely located cities have generally been found to be identical. When one of such twin cities sees an economic slowdown, the event overlaps with increased crime rate in it as compared to the other city. When the economic health is similar in both cities, the two cities exhibit similar crime rates. Therefore, this finding provides definitive evidence that crime rate is a direct result of slowing economy.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

(A) Reliable studies have found that lack of financial well-being increases the likelihood of criminal behavior in individuals.
(B) Increasing crime rate is not a cause of slowing economy.
(C) Economy of a city with twin city is generally no slower than another city with no twin.
(D) In a pair of twin cities both suffering from high crime rate, the economies are equally slow.
(E) Twin cities are no less likely to suffer from high crime rate than other cities with no twin.


This is a CR Butler Question


 


This Month's Butler Questions are Sponsored and Provided by Experts' Global
for SC Butler and CR Butler

 

Experts Global

 

Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts