Lucky1994
Hello Experts,
How can we say that reducing the population of ferret will weaken the argument (will increase the number of nutria). It can also be possible that once ferret population is reduced, jaguar will attack nutria(because jaguar is natural predator of nutria as stated in the argument) and this will strengthen the argument (will reduce the number of nutria).
Please explain why option E is correct?
Thanks
Lakshay
Hi Lakshay
The questions asks: Which of the following, if true,
casts the most doubt on the ranger’s plan to introduce jaguars as an effective way to control the nutria population?
Therefore, we are not looking only for an absolute weakener, but also for that option which weakens the conclusion the most
relative to the other options. This is true of most such questions on the GMAT.
The South American jaguar, by attacking the chief predator of the nutria in Louisiana, adversely affects one means of controlling the nutria population and thus
may have an adverse effect on the aim of controlling nutria. There is no other option which adversely affects the conclusion - hence, option (E) is the correct answer to this question because it does the
most among the given options to weaken the conclusion.
Hope this helps.