Last visit was: 05 Sep 2026, 08:40 It is currently 05 Sep 2026, 08:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
MT1302
Joined: 10 Jan 2023
Last visit: 05 Dec 2024
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
948
 [15]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Posts: 94
Kudos: 948
 [15]
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,059
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 793
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,059
Kudos: 909
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 480
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 480
Kudos: 522
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abdatta
Joined: 19 May 2024
Last visit: 15 Apr 2025
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
45
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V85 DI82
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V85 DI82
Posts: 36
Kudos: 45
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don't agree with F being the purpose of the passage. The passage specifically ends with mentioning that scientists must take into consideration "this shortcoming". The passage is not talking about general critical analysis, but rather particularly this shortcoming.

So it makes more sense to me that C should be the purpose which is more specific to this particular shortcoming mentioned in the passage.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
cheshire
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 26 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Sep 2025
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
314
 [1]
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 256
Kudos: 314
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
“To suggest that the mathematical probability of a hypothesis needs to be considered before accepting the hypothesis.”
This focuses solely on the probability angle. It captures the specific shortcoming (that stellar encounters are too rare) but it doesn’t by itself convey the author’s broader intent, which is to warn scientists against adopting the Encounter Hypothesis at all before they’ve thought through its flaw.

Quote:
“To discourage acceptance of a hypothesis about a particular astronomical event without critical analysis.”
This both (a) flags the need for critical scrutiny and (b) actively advises against unthinking acceptance of the Encounter Hypothesis. It covers the full thrust of the passage: introduce the theory, show why it’s fatally unlikely, and urge scientists not to accept it uncritically.


abdatta
I don't agree with F being the purpose of the passage. The passage specifically ends with mentioning that scientists must take into consideration "this shortcoming". The passage is not talking about general critical analysis, but rather particularly this shortcoming.

So it makes more sense to me that C should be the purpose which is more specific to this particular shortcoming mentioned in the passage.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Usernamevisible
Joined: 09 Jun 2022
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 480
Own Kudos:
110
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,282
Products:
Posts: 480
Kudos: 110
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have a doubt

I chose Option C for Passage (Blank 1) because the passage specifically criticizes the Encounter Hypothesis on the grounds that encounters between stars are extremely improbable.

I eliminated Option F because the passage never explicitly says that scientists should be discouraged from accepting the hypothesis; it only says that they should take this shortcoming into consideration before accepting it.

Also, the phrase critical analysis in Option F felt broader than what the passage discusses, since the criticism appears to focus on one particular issue namely, the improbability of stellar encounters rather than on a general need for critical analysis.

Why is F still considered a better description of the passage's overall purpose than C?
User avatar
WildSnow
Joined: 30 Apr 2026
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 18
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Usernamevisible
I have a doubt

I chose Option C for Passage (Blank 1) because the passage specifically criticizes the Encounter Hypothesis on the grounds that encounters between stars are extremely improbable.

I eliminated Option F because the passage never explicitly says that scientists should be discouraged from accepting the hypothesis; it only says that they should take this shortcoming into consideration before accepting it.

Also, the phrase critical analysis in Option F felt broader than what the passage discusses, since the criticism appears to focus on one particular issue namely, the improbability of stellar encounters rather than on a general need for critical analysis.

Why is F still considered a better description of the passage's overall purpose than C?
(C) says: To suggest that the mathematical probability of a hypothesis needs to be considered before accepting the hypothesis.
Pay attention because the passage says: e[color=#0f0f0f]ncounters between stars are so rare as to be improbable.

The passage talks about the improbability of the encounter, NOT the hypothesis itself.
[/color]
Moderators:
Math Expert
113150 posts
DI Forum Moderator
409 posts