Last visit was: 28 Mar 2025, 10:07 It is currently 28 Mar 2025, 10:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
AnkurGMAT20
Joined: 12 Jul 2020
Last visit: 13 Mar 2025
Posts: 142
Own Kudos:
829
 [27]
Given Kudos: 265
Location: India
Schools: IIM IIM IIM IIM
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q79 V83 DI79
GMAT 1: 530 Q42 V20
GMAT 2: 640 Q48 V29
GPA: 6.23
Schools: IIM IIM IIM IIM
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q79 V83 DI79
GMAT 2: 640 Q48 V29
Posts: 142
Kudos: 829
 [27]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
26
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,400
Own Kudos:
4,240
 [13]
Given Kudos: 135
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,400
Kudos: 4,240
 [13]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
Jayam12
Joined: 31 Oct 2023
Last visit: 22 Mar 2025
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Posts: 61
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sachi-in
Joined: 12 Oct 2023
Last visit: 03 Mar 2025
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 146
Posts: 126
Kudos: 209
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Jayam12
Can someone help me understand why option D is not correct? What if it was a new technique of having "faint and almost invisible lines..." hence not considered incomplete


Euphronios painted this : One side depicting death of the mythic hero Sarpedon; the other, several anonymous Athenian youths.
The youts lack Sarpedon's detail; their limited musculature is portrayed using faint, almost invisible lines and seems unfinished.
Scholars have, however, dismissed the idea that Euphronios failed to complete the side depicting the Athenian youths.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest reason for the scholars position regarding the krater?


Prethinking: Place yourself in the shoes of the scholars .. why might they have come to this conclusion ?
If they have had some evidience or prior analogous situations etc that led them to conclude this, right ?


a) No other examples of Euphronios work have survived, though descriptions of several work do exisit. - Reject, doesn't inform the scholar anything
b) Other existing krater from the time period depict one scene on one side and a related scene on the other side. - Reject , sheds light on Sarpedon but says nothing about unfinished lines to the the scholars
c) The mythic hero Sarpedon was a stock figure used by sixth-century painters to comment on the concept of heroism. - Reject , sheds light on Sarpedon but says nothing about unfinished lines to the the scholars

once the first 3 are quickly eliminated we can focus on d , e

d) Euphronios's work is among the first examples of the use of a new technique for depicting the body and its musculature.
This was a new form of painting <-> Dismiss the Idea Euphronios failed to complete the side depicting the Athenian youths
I may possibly have thought 1st one as an evidence and 2nd as the conclusion, BUT :

These two statements are so related that they can be thought of as like an Conclusion and Extrapolated-Conclusion,
We need an evidence to prove it ( note the first is not a evidence , it's like a pre-conclusion )
( I kept it as a good option, but got the concept behind the reasoning once I went through E)

e) Euphronios's cotemporaries generally included only minimal detail when painting unheralded characters.
Now this obliterates the confusion we had in previous statement. It clearly is an evidence, not a AIR-TIGHT proof but something that proves the possibility that this was an EXISTING art form commonly practiced !

So E is the choice we are looking for ( spent 2:30s in this question resolving this confusion )
User avatar
JoeKan1234
Joined: 27 Aug 2022
Last visit: 23 Dec 2024
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 66
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E IMO. I base my analysis completely on the passage (premises, reasoning and conclusion) while making sure that I find new evidence relevant to the passage to support the conclusion. D is simply irrelevant. CR is just like a reading comprehension test.
User avatar
kkannan2
Joined: 20 Feb 2022
Last visit: 12 Aug 2024
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: United States
Posts: 31
Kudos: 8
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel and AnkurGMAT20, could you explain why (D) is incorrect and (E) is correct?

Here is my reasoning:

d) Euphronios's work is among the first examples of the use of a new technique for depicting the body and its musculature.
I thought that this was correct because the main reasoning behind the conclusion is that the musculature of the athenian youths was faint and portrayed using almost invisible lines. Given this, and the fact that Choice (D) tells us that this is a new technique, isn't this an alternate factor that explains why the work is the way it is, adding credibility to the idea that the work could have been finished? For strengtheners, we don't need an absolute proof that the conclusion is true, it just needs to be more believable. Choice (D) fills that role.

e) Euphronios's contemporaries generally included only minimal detail when painting unheralded characters.
I ruled this choice out quite quickly, as it seems irrelevant. Whether or not the contemporaries of Euphronios included minimal detail or not adds no credibility to the idea that the work of Euphronios was unfinished or not. He may or may not have finished the work whether this is true or not. Further, this is not in scope of the conclusion because it mentions contemporaries of Euphronios and not his work itself. I think there is a jump being made here that just because contemporaries of Euphronios depicted unheralded characters in this way, there is a higher probability that he would have too.

Please shed some light on my analysis and where I went wrong. Thanks for your help!
User avatar
tinbq
Joined: 04 Nov 2016
Last visit: 26 May 2024
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 599
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.12
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 121
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts,

Would you please help to explain why each choice is right or wrong? Thank you.
User avatar
mnz27
Joined: 27 Jul 2023
Last visit: 20 Jun 2024
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Posts: 13
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Jayam12
Can someone help me understand why option D is not correct? What if it was a new technique of having "faint and almost invisible lines..." hence not considered incomplete

Because D gives you that both sides were not painted well
User avatar
jain67
Joined: 17 Jan 2022
Last visit: 09 Nov 2024
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
21
 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Leadership
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q85 V81 DI80
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q85 V81 DI80
Posts: 54
Kudos: 21
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray I have gone through your explanation but still, I would get confused between D and E in the exam. Also how can we surely say that if his contemporaries used the same style then Euphrnios also drew the same style?
User avatar
Dbrunik
Joined: 13 Apr 2024
Last visit: 16 Feb 2025
Posts: 288
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 267
Location: United States (MN)
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT Focus 1: 625 Q84 V82 DI77
GMAT Focus 1: 625 Q84 V82 DI77
Posts: 288
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i picked D. I think the key takeaway here is that when one reads "new technique" you come to think that the technique is thus different than the old technique, and that this new evidence serves to support the idea that the vase was completed, just with a new/different method. This is a leap. For example, if a homes were previously constructed with bricks, and now they are constructed with titatnium, does the simple fact of a material change imply that the home is done being constructed? you cant make this leap, and E is a better answer.
User avatar
Dbrunik
Joined: 13 Apr 2024
Last visit: 16 Feb 2025
Posts: 288
Own Kudos:
89
 [1]
Given Kudos: 267
Location: United States (MN)
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT Focus 1: 625 Q84 V82 DI77
GMAT Focus 1: 625 Q84 V82 DI77
Posts: 288
Kudos: 89
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Imagine you’re studying a famous early photographer, Julia, who’s known for being one of the first to experiment with lighting techniques. One of her most famous portraits, "The Traveler," has intense, shadowy contrasts on the main subject’s face, but there are faint, almost invisible details in the background.

Now, scholars have argued that the faint background was intentional rather than an unfinished part of the photograph. You’re given two pieces of information:

(Similar to D): “Julia’s work is among the first examples of using artificial lighting in portrait photography.”

(Similar to E): “Julia’s contemporaries generally minimized background detail in portraits to focus attention on the subject.”

Why (Similar to D) Doesn't Help Here: Knowing that Julia was a pioneer of artificial lighting doesn’t clarify whether the background was intentionally faint or if it’s incomplete. This fact tells us about a general technique she used in her work, but it doesn’t directly address why the background in this specific portrait looks faint—it could be intentional or unintentional.

Why (Similar to E) Helps: Knowing that photographers in Julia’s era often minimized background details to emphasize the main subject directly supports the argument that the faint background detail in "The Traveler" was an intentional, finished choice. It aligns with common practices of her time, strengthening the scholars’ position that Julia completed her work as intended.
User avatar
shashank07!
Joined: 28 May 2024
Last visit: 09 Mar 2025
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Posts: 13
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray what is the relevance of contemporaries in the option E. I chose this option but was confused due to this word
MartyMurray
Explanation

The Euphronios krater, a sixth-century-B.C.E ceramic vase, was named for its painter, Euphronios. One side depicts the death of the mythic hero Sarpedon; the other, several anonymous Athenian youths arming themselves for battle. The youts lack Sarpedon's anatomical detail; their limited musculature is portrayed using faint, almost invisible lines and seems unfinished. Scholars have, however, dismissed the idea that Euphronios failed to complete the side depicting the Athenian youths.

The passage says that scholars have concluded basically the following:

It is not true that "that Euphronios failed to complete the side depicting the Athenian youths."

The passage provides no support for that conclusion. Rather, it provides a reason to believe otherwise:

The youths lack Sarpedon's anatomical detail; their limited musculature is portrayed using faint, almost invisible lines and seems unfinished.

Then, we are asked the following question:

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest reason for the scholars position regarding the krater?

The correct answer will provide support for the scholars' conclusion.

a) No other examples of Euphronios's work have survived, though descriptions of several works do exist.

The fact that no other example of Euphronios's work have survived does not indicate anything about whether this particular work was completed.

Eliminate.

b) Other existing kraters from the time period depict one scene on one side and a related scene on the other side.

This choice's stating that other kraters depict one scene on one side and a related scene on the other side is meant to tempt us to choose this choice because it could be perceived as somehow confirming an aspect of what the passage says about the Euphronios krater, which has one scene on one side and another scene on the other side.

However, we need to confirm one specific idea, that it's not the case that Euphronios failed to complete the side depicting the Athenian youths.

So, since the information in this choice does not indicates anything about what constitutes a completed Krater, it does not do what we need.

Eliminate.

c) The mythic hero Sarpedon was a stock figure used by sixth-century painters to comment on the concept of heroism.

We have to be careful not to run with this choice and create an unsupported story. For example, it would be easy to decide that the fact that Sarpedon was a stock figure used by sixth-century painters somehow explains why Sarpedon has anatomical detail that the youths don't have even though the vase was completed.

The truth is that the fact that Sarpedon was a stock figure used by sixth-century painters doesn't mean anything about whether Euphronios completed the side depicting the Athenian youths. All that information means is that Sarpedon was commonly used for the purpose of commenting on the concept of heroism. The fact that Sarpedon was commonly used doesn't indicate whether Euphronios considered the side depicting the youths complete.

Eliminate.

d) Euphronios's work is among the first examples of the use of a new technique for depicting the body and its musculature.

This choice is tricky to eliminate since we might decide that it means that the portrayal of the youths' musculature using faint, almost invisible lines is complete because it's an example of "a new technique for depicting the body and its musculature."

However, there's a key thing we need to notice, which is that the passage indicates that the musculature of both Sarpedon and the youths was depicted by Euphronios.

So, this "new technique" doesn't refer to how one or the other was depicted. It refers to how Euphronios depicted musculature in general, whether with "Sarpedon's anatomical detail" or "using faint, almost invisible lines."

Thus, we have no reason to believe that this choice is about only the way the youths were depicted, and thus it doesn't indicate anything about whether the side with the depiction of the youths was completed.

If there were no better choice, we still might feel forced to decide that "using faint, almost invisible lines" is the "new technique." However, we aren't forced to do so since (E) is a better choice.

Keep just in case, but look for a better choice.

e) Euphronios's contemporaries generally included only minimal detail when painting unheralded characters.

This choice indicates that "minimal detail," such as "faint, almost invisible lines," was commonly used when painting unheralded characters.

"Anonymous Athenian youths" could be considered "unheralded," meaning "not previously known about or recognized." So, in "using faint, almost invisible lines" to depicts them, Euphronios would have been doing what many artists of the time did when they completed works.

Thus, what this choice says indicates that the work was completed, in a style common at the time.

The correct answer is (E).
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7266 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts