(A) science magazine for nonspecialists
Correct
Why it works:
* Matches explanatory tone
* Uses non-technical language
* Provides overview + comparison, not deep research
* Typical of popular science writing
(B) textbook on radiation physics
Wrong
Why wrong:
* Would include technical concepts (radiation theory, equations)
* Passage avoids physics depth completely
* No formulas, no scientific derivations
* Focus is application (medical imaging), not physics theory
Trap: subject match but depth mismatch
(C) medical research journal
Wrong
Why wrong:
* Research journals include data, experiments, methodology
* Passage has none of these
* Tone is explanatory, not investigative
Trap: formal tone illusion
(D) CT users' manual
Wrong
Why wrong:
* Manual would give instructions and explain how to operate CT
* Passage does NOT instruct anything
* Covers multiple techniques, not just CT
Trap: purpose mismatch (instruction vs explanation)
(E) monograph on early twentieth-century medical technology
Wrong
Why wrong:
* Passage is NOT historical analysis
* Mentions 1895 briefly → just background
* Focus is modern comparison (X-ray vs CT)
* CT is recent → not early 20th century focus
Trap: time-period distortion