Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 12:19 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 12:19
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
fozzzy
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Last visit: 17 May 2015
Posts: 573
Own Kudos:
7,007
 [33]
Given Kudos: 543
Posts: 573
Kudos: 7,007
 [33]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
29
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,859
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,897
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,859
Kudos: 811,429
 [19]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
fozzzy
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Last visit: 17 May 2015
Posts: 573
Own Kudos:
7,007
 [2]
Given Kudos: 543
Posts: 573
Kudos: 7,007
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
fozzzy
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Last visit: 17 May 2015
Posts: 573
Own Kudos:
7,007
 [1]
Given Kudos: 543
Posts: 573
Kudos: 7,007
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Seems a very basic question, but what other possible concepts are tested here? The official explanations was pretty convoluted had a parallelogram and all of that.
User avatar
mydreammba
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Last visit: 06 Dec 2013
Posts: 224
Own Kudos:
1,678
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE:Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 224
Kudos: 1,678
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersection of three straight roads, each having parallel edges and each having the same width. what is the value of t?

(1) r = 140. Not sufficient.
(2) s = 160. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Consider the width of the roads to be 0 as shown below:
Attachment:
Roads.png
From the figure we have that r+s+t=360 degrees --> 140+160+t=360 --> t=60 degrees. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Bunnel

I have small doubt here

Suppose the length is not 0 then you will have two variables and you cannot solve the equation i.e the equation becomes

Suppose width=X

Then T= 360-3X-R-S

and here you have 2 variables and 1 equation you cannot get a single solution

Am i right?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,859
Own Kudos:
811,429
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,897
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,859
Kudos: 811,429
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mydreammba
Bunuel

The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersection of three straight roads, each having parallel edges and each having the same width. what is the value of t?

(1) r = 140. Not sufficient.
(2) s = 160. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Consider the width of the roads to be 0 as shown below:
Attachment:
Roads.png
From the figure we have that r+s+t=360 degrees --> 140+160+t=360 --> t=60 degrees. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Bunnel

I have small doubt here

Suppose the length is not 0 then you will have two variables and you cannot solve the equation i.e the equation becomes

Suppose width=X

Then T= 360-3X-R-S

and here you have 2 variables and 1 equation you cannot get a single solution

Am i right?

No you are not. The edges of the road are parallel, so there is 0 degree angle between them.
User avatar
mydreammba
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Last visit: 06 Dec 2013
Posts: 224
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE:Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 224
Kudos: 1,678
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
mydreammba
Bunuel

The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersection of three straight roads, each having parallel edges and each having the same width. what is the value of t?

(1) r = 140. Not sufficient.
(2) s = 160. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Consider the width of the roads to be 0 as shown below:
Attachment:
Roads.png
From the figure we have that r+s+t=360 degrees --> 140+160+t=360 --> t=60 degrees. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Bunnel

I have small doubt here

Suppose the length is not 0 then you will have two variables and you cannot solve the equation i.e the equation becomes

Suppose width=X

Then T= 360-3X-R-S

and here you have 2 variables and 1 equation you cannot get a single solution

Am i right?

No you are not. The edges of the road are parallel, so there is 0 degree angle between them.

Thanks Bunnel Got it
User avatar
anshunadir
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Last visit: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Posts: 67
Kudos: 387
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
(1)+(2) Consider the width of the roads to be 0 as shown below:

Bunuel - can you please elaborate it further ? why do we need to make this assumption ?

Regards.
User avatar
Narenn
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 9,295
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,711
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Test: Test
Posts: 9,295
Kudos: 11,307
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anshunadir
Quote:
(1)+(2) Consider the width of the roads to be 0 as shown below:

Bunuel - can you please elaborate it further ? why do we need to make this assumption ?

Regards.

Go thru the file attached. Then you will understand the point which Bunuel is making.

Regards,

Abhijit
Attachments

parallel lines.docx [11.83 KiB]
Downloaded 791 times

avatar
piyusharma
Joined: 28 May 2012
Last visit: 29 Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Guys,

I assumed Angle R = Angle S due to the parallel lines property. Hence for me each statement was sufficient. Why is R not equal to S?
User avatar
Ashishmathew01081987
Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Last visit: 07 Jun 2020
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 71
Status:I am not a product of my circumstances. I am a product of my decisions
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GPA: 3.92
WE:Operations (Energy)
Posts: 92
Kudos: 313
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
piyusharma
Hi Guys,

I assumed Angle R = Angle S due to the parallel lines property. Hence for me each statement was sufficient. Why is R not equal to S?


Because the two parallel lines you considered are not cut by the same traversal. So angle R is not equal to angle S.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,419
 [3]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,419
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
piyusharma
Hi Guys,

I assumed Angle R = Angle S due to the parallel lines property. Hence for me each statement was sufficient. Why is R not equal to S?

Also note that in DS questions, the two statements never contradict each other. If you had assumed that angle R = angle S, the two statements should have told you that that is not true.
Statement 1 tells you that angle R is 140. According to you, then angle S should be 140 too. But statement 2 tells you that angle S is 160. This means there is something wrong in your assumption.
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,063
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,063
Kudos: 20,007
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

Attachment:
Roads.png
Roads.png [ 25.68 KiB | Viewed 15398 times ]

The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersection of three straight roads, each having parallel edges and each having the same width. what is the value of t?

(1) r = 140
(2) s = 160

From the original condition, we can see that there are 3 variables (r,s,t), and one equation (r+s+t=360), so we need 2 more equations, which are given from the 2 conditions, so there is high chance (C) will be our answer.
Looking at the conditions together, r+s+t=140+160+t=360, so it answers the question 'yes', and the answer becomes (C).

For cases where we need 2 more equation, such as original conditions with “2 variables”, or “3 variables and 1 equation”, or “4 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 70% chance that C is the answer, while E has 25% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since C is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, D or E.
User avatar
Avinash_R1
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Last visit: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 20
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
piyusharma
Hi Guys,

I assumed Angle R = Angle S due to the parallel lines property. Hence for me each statement was sufficient. Why is R not equal to S?

Also note that in DS questions, the two statements never contradict each other. If you had assumed that angle R = angle S, the two statements should have told you that that is not true.
Statement 1 tells you that angle R is 140. According to you, then angle S should be 140 too. But statement 2 tells you that angle S is 160. This means there is something wrong in your assumption.

Can you please explain how to answer this question?
User avatar
gmexamtaker1
Joined: 16 Jul 2018
Last visit: 13 Feb 2023
Posts: 208
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 261
Products:
Posts: 208
Kudos: 80
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="Bunuel"]
The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersection of three straight roads, each having parallel edges and each having the same width. what is the value of t?

(1) r = 140. Not sufficient.
(2) s = 160. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Consider the width of the roads to be 0 as shown below:
Attachment:
Roads.png
From the figure we have that r+s+t=360 degrees --> 140+160+t=360 --> t=60 degrees. Sufficient.

I cannot understand the thinking process that results in witdth=0 can someone elaborate?
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,991
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,991
Kudos: 1,118
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109859 posts
498 posts
212 posts