VivekPrateek
Hi
Bunuel and Verbal Admin,
I am so confused on this answer. Not able to justify this answer.
Please take my comment on this and let me know if I am wrong.Now let us think that population of India is 1.4 billion and Population of Sri Lanka is 10 million. Now let us think one movie in Sri Lanka is super hit. Is there any possibility that just because of the population it would be super hit. I seriously doubt that.
Point 2: Let us in city Goop there are 1000 theatre and in Bap there is 50 theatres, Now I think this is the ans(Correct me). Why?
Now for 1000 theatre, now in this case even if the movie is good, population is spread out and because of this the movie was not double the revenue and in 50 theatre of Baap the population is concentrated and this is the reason the movie is super hit.
Can some one help me on this ?
Hi Vivek,
The passage says that 'Film Orange' genre is popular in Goop, however the box office revenue (aka earnings) of movies of this genre at Bap is double the revenue generated for the genre at Goop. Remember, we're talking about money, not whether the movie was 'hit' or not.
Option C is doing the exact opposite of explaining the discrepancy. If there are more theaters at Goop, then there should be no reason why the revenue is less here. If anything it should have led to an increase in box office collection.
Option D is the only one which helps resolve the paradox. A five-times higher population explains why films of this genre earn more at Boop, as there are likely more people going to theaters to watch the movie than at Goop.
Nowhere else have we been given any information of the population spread of either Goop or Bap, hence we'll only consider the information we have at hand.