Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
The Gaul chronicler Peter, recorded the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, noted laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(A) recorded the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, noted laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(B) recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, notes laboriously that it was contemporaneous to the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(C) recorded the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, while noting laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(D) recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, notes laboriously that it was contemporaneous on the peace of Antalcidas, the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(E) recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, notes laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The Gaul chronicler Peter, recorded the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, noted laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(A) recorded the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, noted laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra. (B) recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, notes laboriously that it was contemporaneous to the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra. (C) recorded the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, noted laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra. (D) recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, notes laboriously that it was contemporaneous on the peace of Antalcidas, the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra. (E) recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, notes laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
Show more
I'll go with E a history lesson from a history major
The Gaul chronicler Peter, recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC (participle clause, correctly modifies Peter), notes (correct verb) laboriously that it was contemporaneous with ("with" is the correct preposition) the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius (it is contemporaneous with two other incidents), and that (this expletive introduces another parallel idea) it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra (after X and before Y).
Yeah, its E because of the way the commas are used, the content within the commas must be a non-restrictive clause. D and E are the only ones that survive. E is parallel.
I choose E.
A and C out -> recorded, noted/noting -> awkward construction. Something wrong as well, can't put my finger on it.
B -> "that sixteen years" is wrong
D-> "contemporaneous on" is not correct
E -> "contemporaneous with" is better.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.