Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 20:51 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 20:51
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions
User avatar
akela
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Last visit: 23 May 2023
Posts: 1,227
Own Kudos:
6,354
 [28]
Given Kudos: 128
Products:
Posts: 1,227
Kudos: 6,354
 [28]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
25
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,054
Own Kudos:
2,196
 [1]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,054
Kudos: 2,196
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
shalabhg27
Joined: 26 Mar 2016
Last visit: 02 May 2018
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 14
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,054
Own Kudos:
2,196
 [2]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,054
Kudos: 2,196
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shalabhg27
OA -> E
Opposite is not true i.e L rubellus is not there because leaf layer is already thin.

Hi,

(E) L. rubellus does not favor habitats where the leaf litter layer is considerably thinner than what is required by goblin ferns.
Negation: "L. rubellus does not favor habitats where the leaf litter layer is NOT considerably thinner than what is required by goblin ferns".

This means that wherever the litter is thick (not considerably thin), they are not present. --> If they are not present in the thick layer of litter, then this weakens the argument, since it would mean that the thick layer of litter is being thinned out by some other being/natural force than the L. Rubellus.

OA is correct.
Hope that helps !!

P.S.: 1 piece of advice for you; instead of arguing that why the OA is incorrect, try to understand where did you go wrong. Since, this is an official LSAT question, it can't be wrong. It will help you to gain more knowledge.
User avatar
akela
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Last visit: 23 May 2023
Posts: 1,227
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 128
Products:
Posts: 1,227
Kudos: 6,354
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
The trigger "˜thus’ helps us locate the conclusion here: L. rubellus is probably responsible for the fern’s disappearance. This is a causation conclusion: L is causing the fern to disappear. What is this conclusion based on? areas where fern recently vanished are teeming with L and have unusually thin leaf litter (and we’re told L eats leaf litter). It certainly seems reasonable to conclude that this is all L’s fault, but we know we must be very careful when making a causation conclusion. The premises offer us a correlation, but that’s never enough to prove causation. Perhaps an unknown factor is causing the fern to vanish, and L didn’t enter those areas until later? This could all just be one big misunderstanding! Let’s diagram the core:

Spots where fern recently vanished have unusually thin leaf litter, which is required by the fern + those spots are teeming with L, which eats leaf litter --> L is probably responsible for the fern’s disappearance

We’re looking for an answer choice that will make a coincidence less likely, and we’ll get rid of answer choices if negating them doesn’t kill the conclusion:

(A) doesn’t mention L so probably wrong; let’s negate it and see what happens: some North American forests with thick leaf litter don’t have any fern. No one ever said fern has to be in every spot that has thick leaf litter! So, even if the opposite of (A) is true, L could still be the reason for the fern’s disappearance. Get rid of this one.

(B) Let’s negate this one too: some earthworms other than L eat leaf litter. Even so, L could still be responsible for the fern’s disappearance. Get rid of this one.

(C) You’d probably expect to find evidence of dead fern in areas where the fern recently vanished. What if the fern’s dead leaves only made up the smaller part of the leaf litter (again, negation)? This changes nothing... L could still be responsible for the fern’s disappearance. Get rid of this one.

(D) Try negation again: what if you could find some spots in North American forests that have both L and fern? Even then, L could still be responsible for the fern’s disappearance _ perhaps the fern will disappear from those spots as well in the near future. Get rid of this one.

(E) Negation has worked really well for us in the first four answer choices, and at this point we’re hoping (E) is right, otherwise we’re in trouble. Let’s try negating this one as well: L favors habitats where the leaf litter layer is considerably thinner than what is required by the fern. Aha! This means that the fern vanished before L arrived! L couldn’t be responsible for the fern’s disappearance!

So (E) is correct.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,424
Own Kudos:
1,010
 [1]
Posts: 19,424
Kudos: 1,010
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
507 posts
363 posts