It is currently 20 Sep 2017, 16:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The high cost of productions is severely limiting which

Author Message
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 853

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

The high cost of productions is severely limiting which [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2007, 10:10
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The high cost of productions is severely limiting which operas are available to the public. These costs necessitate reliance on large corporate sponsors, who in return demand that only the most famous operas be produced. Determining which operas will be produced should rest only with ticket purchasers at the box office, not with large corporate sponsors. If we reduce production budgets so that operas can be supported exclusively by box-office receipts and donations from individuals, then the public will be able to see less famous operas.

Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?

(A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions.
(B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas.
(C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas.
(D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced.
(E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 744

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas, Texas

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2007, 10:14
B !
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 736

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2007, 10:55
C.

If this is the answer then i will share my .02 dollars worth

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1553

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 1

Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2007, 11:21
I agree with C.

If there is no corporate sponsorship, producers will play safe by producing only famous operas so that they dont incur a loss.
_________________

My Profile/GMAT/MBA Story
http://www.gmatclub.com/forum/111-t59345

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 36

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2007, 11:39
C
A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions.
- this one strengthens the argument -> a few go to any opera
(B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas.
- not related to the question
(C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas.
- opera companies will produce only famous operas, therefore there will be more not less famous operas -> weakens the argument
(D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced.
- this is part of the assumption
(E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.
- not related

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 94

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2007, 13:12
I agree. C is the answer.

Most people will massively attend popular operas, thus producers will only be able to produce those.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 388

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

Location: Boston, MA

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2007, 15:48
vineetgupta wrote:
The high cost of productions is severely limiting which operas are available to the public. These costs necessitate reliance on large corporate sponsors, who in return demand that only the most famous operas be produced. Determining which operas will be produced should rest only with ticket purchasers at the box office, not with large corporate sponsors. If we reduce production budgets so that operas can be supported exclusively by box-office receipts and donations from individuals, then the public will be able to see less famous operas.

Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?

(A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions.
(B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas.
(C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas.
(D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced.
(E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.

errrr... C? And only by POE.
The information that:
"Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas."
indicates that box office sales and donations would not be enough to cover productions even after reducing the budget.

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2007, 16:11
C for me, too. The argument says fewer corp. sponsors would mean more availibility of less famous operas. One possibility of that not happening is if no operas will be held at all and C provides that.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 727

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 4

Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College

### Show Tags

18 Jan 2007, 06:02
vineetgupta wrote:
The high cost of productions is severely limiting which operas are available to the public. These costs necessitate reliance on large corporate sponsors, who in return demand that only the most famous operas be produced. Determining which operas will be produced should rest only with ticket purchasers at the box office, not with large corporate sponsors. If we reduce production budgets so that operas can be supported exclusively by box-office receipts and donations from individuals, then the public will be able to see less famous operas.

Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?

(A) A few ticket purchasers go to the opera for the sake of going to the opera, not to see specific operatic productions.
(B) The reduction of opera production budgets would not reduce the desire of large corporate sponsors to support operas.
(C) Without the support of large corporate sponsors, opera companies could not afford to produce any but the most famous of operas.

My answer. Without the support, opera companies do the same that they wanted to avoid doing.

(D) Large corporate sponsors will stop supporting opera productions if they are denied control over which operas will be produced.
(E) The combination of individual donations and box-office receipts cannot match the amounts of money obtained through sponsorship by large corporations.

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 4

Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 853

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2007, 05:00
Thanks guys, the OA is C.

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

20 Jan 2007, 05:00
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
When the products of several competing suppliers are perceived by 0 21 Dec 2015, 02:21
Mr. Meltzer: Limits on offshore oil drilling here have cost 2 01 Dec 2007, 14:42
When the products of several competing suppliers 0 15 Sep 2013, 13:34
The high cost of productions is severely limiting which 6 28 Jun 2008, 02:37
The high cost of productions is severely limiting which 12 14 Jul 2011, 01:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by