It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 22:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The hypothesis of an expanding Earth has never attracted

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: paris
The hypothesis of an expanding Earth has never attracted [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2006, 06:53
The hypothesis of an expanding Earth has never attracted notable support, and if it were not for the historical example of continental drift, such indifference might be a legitimate response to an apparently improbable concept. It should be remembered, however, that drift too was once regarded as illusory, but the idea was kept alive until evidence from physicists compelled geologists to reinterpret their data.
Of course, it would be as dangerous to overreact to history by concluding that the majority must now be wrong about expansion as it would be to reenact the response that greeted the suggestion that the continents had drifted. The cases are not precisely analogous. There were serious problems with the pre-drift world view that a drift theory could help to resolve, whereas Earth expansion appears to offer no comparable advantages. If, however, physicists could show that the Earth’s gravitational force has decreased with time, expansion would have to be reconsidered and accommodated.

24. The passage indicates that one reason why the expansion hypothesis has attracted little support is that it will not
(A) overcome deficiencies in current geologic hypotheses
(B) clarify theories concerning the Earth’s gravitational forces
(C) complement the theory of continental drift
(D) accommodate relevant theories from the field of physics
(E) withstand criticism from scientists outside the field of geology
_________________

time is not on my side

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1438

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Re: RC- short text [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2006, 10:54
ugo_castelo wrote:
The hypothesis of an expanding Earth has never attracted notable support, and if it were not for the historical example of continental drift, such indifference might be a legitimate response to an apparently improbable concept. It should be remembered, however, that drift too was once regarded as illusory, but the idea was kept alive until evidence from physicists compelled geologists to reinterpret their data.
Of course, it would be as dangerous to overreact to history by concluding that the majority must now be wrong about expansion as it would be to reenact the response that greeted the suggestion that the continents had drifted. The cases are not precisely analogous. There were serious problems with the pre-drift world view that a drift theory could help to resolve, whereas Earth expansion appears to offer no comparable advantages. If, however, physicists could show that the Earth’s gravitational force has decreased with time, expansion would have to be reconsidered and accommodated.

24. The passage indicates that one reason why the expansion hypothesis has attracted little support is that it will not
(A) overcome deficiencies in current geologic hypotheses
(B) clarify theories concerning the Earth’s gravitational forces
(C) complement the theory of continental drift
(D) accommodate relevant theories from the field of physics
(E) withstand criticism from scientists outside the field of geology


B it is...

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 13

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 743

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas, Texas
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2006, 12:37
passage says "whereas Earth expansion appears to offer no comparable advantages" over the "drift theory". Therefore (A)
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2006, 19:07
A 2.

read the last few sentences. it is drawing analogy between the drift theory and the expansion theory. so why drift was accepted while the expansion was not. it is the key.

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1438

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Nov 2006, 00:59
Ugo would you post the OA pls? I don't agree with A.

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 13

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: paris
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Nov 2006, 03:26
The OA is A

I got it wrong too... I picked B
_________________

time is not on my side

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 24 Nov 2006, 03:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The hypothesis of an expanding Earth has never attracted

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.