Bunuel
The infection of manufacturing lines with bacteria is a serious safety risk that many food manufacturers spend millions of dollars per year to prevent. Because sterilizing stainless steel containers with chemical sterilizers is expensive to do every day, some analysts have recommended installing UV lamps that can effectively sterilize the stainless steel containers without affecting food production. The lamp costs the same as one month’s supply of chemical sterilizers to sterilize the same number of stainless steel containers.
In deciding whether the change would be effective in decreasing the cost of food sterilization, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?
A. Whether food distributors should also sterilize their trucks in order to keep food safe.
B. Whether the UV lamps tend to be effective for longer than a single month.
C. Whether stainless steel containers are more prone to contamination than are other types of containers.
D. Whether appropriate cooking practices can effectively destroy bacteria once food has been shipped to consumers.
E. Whether UV radiation is harmful to workers who come in contact with it.
VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:
For any Useful to Evaluate question, you should look for the piece of information that, depending on the answer to the additional information, would exploit a gap between the premise and the suggested course of action. To do that, you first need to understand the stimulus itself.
The stimulus states that bacterial infection is a dangerous problem for manufacturers. Chemical sterilizers are also very expensive, so analysts have suggested using UV lamps to do the same job since a single UV lamp costs the same as a month's worth of chemical sterilizers that could be used to sterilize the same number of vats. You are then asked what would be useful in figuring out whether the suggestion would help determine whether the change would decrease the cost of food sterilization. (The key here is that it saves money - not that it's safer or more effective.)
The only place that the stimulus discusses cost is where it states that a lamp costs the same as a month of chemical sterilizers in order to sterilize the same number of vats. If the lamps last longer than a month, then they will fulfill the requirement since the lamps will therefore be cheaper than chemical sterilizers. However, if the lamps only last a month (or less) then the lamps will be either the same cost or more expensive than the chemical sterilizers. Therefore the correct answer must be (B).
Among the other answers, you can eliminate (A) and (D) since food safety and other points on the production chain aren't under discussion. Similarly, (E) can be eliminated because worker safety is not a consideration within the argument - only cost is considered. Choice (C) can also be eliminated since the analyst is considering replacing the chemical sterilizers and does not discuss the possibility of using a different type of container.